# Staff after capture · B-first

## Whole neutral source

Original fiction. Len chooses an invented wave mark and tells adult Ren where to put it on a whole paper sheet. Ren marks the wave and places the sheet flat. Len then describes a bend; no one makes that bend in this source. Nobody conducts a standing or viewing check. The source does not say that Len marked, folded or placed the paper. It gives no actual result about a folded display.

## Select after

Actual actor/design/practical evidence distinction and exact step teaching; B3 additionally needs purpose-linked check teaching (Day196 or equivalent); B4 preference/result/unknown teaching. Select only individually taught components.

[Empty own page](../responses/B-first.html) · [Source](../checks/B-first-source.html) · [Selection and access](../teacher/ASSESSMENT.html)

## B-first-B1

**Exact prompt:** Who contributed the design idea, who physically acted, and which proposed action remains unperformed in this source?

**Own heading:** My component 1: Who contributed the design idea, who physically acted, and which proposed action remains unperformed in this source?

**Criterion:** Len supplies choice/direction; Ren actually marks and places; the described bend is unperformed. Do not infer Len’s physical making or a folded result.

**Possible response:** Len chose/directed the wave; Ren marked and placed flat. The bend stays a proposal. Correct source attribution is not observation of this learner’s practical skill.

**Different next-teaching account:** Bea chooses a fictional dot for a label and directs adult Cal, who marks it. Bea describes a lower fold but nobody folds it.

**Teach next:** Trace Bea’s idea and Cal’s physical operation separately, then compare with a new ordinary own directed job. Keep helper contribution and child contribution distinct.

**Look for next:** Next evidence is accurate actor/status separation and any separately observed real learner action, not memorising Len/Ren.

[New own offer](../next/B-first-B1.html)

## B-first-B2

**Exact prompt:** For an own wave-display idea, name a material, proposed actor and an exact action/location.

**Own heading:** My component 2: For an own wave-display idea, name a material, proposed actor and an exact action/location.

**Criterion:** Specific own material→actor→action/location related to an own purpose. Real suitability must be locally checked; no mandatory fold or physical product.

**Possible response:** “I would ask a checked helper to place my whole wave sheet in my chosen spot” can fit a planned flat form; more detailed own steps are also acceptable.

**Different next-teaching account:** Cato’s fictional adult-approved plain sheet waits on a table. Cato proposes a flower mark near its front edge and asks an adult to make that mark; it is unperformed.

**Teach next:** Model one exact instruction from Cato’s separate account, keeping proposal and performance apart. Invite an own new purpose and action/location.

**Look for next:** Next evidence is an own precise instruction with material and actor, and honest practical status.

[New own offer](../next/B-first-B2.html)

## B-first-B3

**Exact prompt:** Choose one question and a suitable proposed check for your own display. What result is actually supplied here?

**Own heading:** My component 3: Choose one question and a suitable proposed check for your own display. What result is actually supplied here?

**Criterion:** A question/action linked to own purpose, with the source’s standing/viewing result absent because no check was conducted. No fabricated result or obligatory trial.

**Possible response:** “Can my wave be seen from my chosen seat? An agreeing adult could look from there.” The source supplies no completed check; the learner may also keep a no-action plan.

**Different next-teaching account:** Dani’s unrelated fictional leaf-face plan asks whether a mark faces an agreed position; nobody looks from that position. The question is retained.

**Teach next:** Identify Dani’s question, proposed actor/action and empty result. Then ask for one purpose-linked check for a new own label, with result open unless real evidence is supplied.

**Look for next:** Next evidence is one own relevant check and accurate performed/unperformed/result status.

[New own offer](../next/B-first-B3.html)

## B-first-B4

**Exact prompt:** Choose a feature to keep or change in an own idea. Explain your reason and what remains unknown.

**Own heading:** My component 4: Choose a feature to keep or change in an own idea. Explain your reason and what remains unknown.

**Criterion:** Specific preference/purpose evaluation without converting the unperformed bend into a tested improvement. A keep decision is valid; no failed result required.

**Possible response:** “I would keep my large wave face because I like its space; I still want to ask whether it can be seen” is one possibility. Other own reasons can fit.

**Different next-teaching account:** Elo keeps a broad fictional cloud face because Elo likes its room. A folded alternative was only drawn; its standing result is unknown.

**Teach next:** Read Elo’s reason and separate it from a functional result. Offer a different own card decision and ask which effect is still a question.

**Look for next:** Next evidence is a specific own feature/reason and an honest unknown effect, not a required redesign.

[New own offer](../next/B-first-B4.html)

Modified from [Prep alignment](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/aciqv9/technologies/curriculum/ac9_tech_design_prep_as_cd_alignment.pdf), [Prep standard elaborations](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/aciqv9/technologies/assessment/ac9_tech_design_se_prep.pdf) and [Prep techniques and conditions](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/aciqv9/technologies/assessment/ac9_tech_design_technique_cond_prep.pdf), © State of Queensland ([QCAA](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/copyright)) 2023, [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), subject to item exceptions. Guidance is adapted; SubjectNest stories, prompts, criteria and teaching moves are original. No endorsement.