B-first · educator feedback
Full source
START choices LITTLE BOOK (rectangle, full key “view the invented reading-page picture”) and THREE DOTS (three outlined dots, full key also “view the invented reading-page picture”). Both rules point to A, which says “A made-up page of large shapes, not a real book”. B says “A spare made-up drawing”, with no rule pointing to it. Back returns START. The supplied purpose explicitly is “two choices to the same reading-page picture”. No actual reading, preference, test or child ownership is supplied.
Questions, criterion and next teaching
- Question: Where do both keys go? Does that fit the one reading-picture-page job?
Source-specific criterion / next help: Both→A, fits explicit purpose; not an automatic two-different-pages rule. Next: compare C06's intentional shared page with C08's actual mismatch.
- Question: Choose new marks or words for that same job. Tell or show what each one means.
Source-specific criterion / next help: Accept a keyed different word/shape/picture preserving the two-to-one intent. A bare familiar icon without a key is insufficient source-backed meaning. Next: add a literal label and read it before checking.
- Question: Choose your own make-believe job for two buttons. Make or direct one part, or show your idea for later.
Source-specific criterion / next help: Child chooses the purpose/part; helper construction is attributed and plan remains plan. Next: offer a neutral useful job with a genuine open option rather than assigning an “own” answer.
- Question: Which private things might need a trusted grown-up’s care? Talk about the kind of thing, not your real details. Sharing a part you really chose is optional.
Source-specific criterion / next help: Name/address/password/identifying photo as generic categories can fit privacy reasoning, not proof about the child's real personal data. Optional owned recognition is separately elicited after actual choice. Next: dated eSafety category card, then a private actual-choice invitation if wanted.
Original grown-up component demands
- Where do the two choices lead? Does sharing a destination fit the stated purpose?
- Give a different explicit representation of the same purpose without silently changing its meaning.
- Choose your own nonpersonal two-choice purpose and make/direct one part, or keep it as a plan.
- Which personal-data categories might need trusted adult care if someone tried adding them? Use generic categories only; recognising an actual own part is optional.
Before offering this selected story, check whole-account familiarity and offer wanted access or communication help. Capture the first response before teaching; passed, declined, unknown and unelicited remain distinct. Keep generic private notes with no child identifiers. Record who chose, who constructed or operated, literal help, and whether each action was actually performed or only planned. A paper plan or source answer does not establish a real software encounter. Any optional actual device action needs a suitable locally approved familiar system and wanted help; an adult records its actual input, software purpose, displayed output and operator separately. Recognition of a genuinely chosen own part is optional, private and can be declined; supplied fiction or generic sorting cannot establish it. Consult only the selected full staff feedback after capture.
Capture before teaching
Unencountered refers to this whole underlying account, not a filename or familiar generic component. Record original response and support first; declined/unelicited is not wrong. Optional actual child actions need an actual locally approved encounter and attributed operator. Generic sorting and supplied fictional ownership are not evidence of learner P01. These criteria are original and noncalibrated.