# Full text and tactile-equivalent routes for eight A4 aids

Every source below is fictional. The one-page SVGs include title/description; PDFs have selectable text but are **untagged**. These linear words and broad-region directions give an alternative without relying on colour, a screen, hearing, fine cut pieces or a visual pattern. An adult can draw four large boxes, read the exact source and accept child-directed pointing, signing or AAC. “Day 1/2” is story order, not real time or a family celebration.

## 1. [Ripple Hall invitation](ripple-invitation.svg) · [PDF](ripple-invitation.pdf)

Title: “Ripple Hall invitation.” Subtitle: “Source A: a fictional future invitation.” A top line says **SOURCE A · FICTIONAL DAY 1 INVITATION**. Main card: **RIPPLE HALL PAPER-CARD SHOW**. “Tomorrow, on Story Day 2, we plan to show two large paper cards in our invented Ripple Hall.” Bottom: “This is an invitation and plan on Story Day 1. It does not show that the show happened. No family event or real hall is described.” Tactile route: one broad INVITATION panel, then a separate NOT-A-REPORT panel. Leave actual attendance unknown.

## 2. [Ripple Hall display plan](ripple-display-plan.svg) · [PDF](ripple-display-plan.pdf)

Title: “Ripple Hall display plan.” Subtitle: “Source B: Miri's imagined wall/table arrangement.” Top: **SOURCE B · FICTIONAL DAY 1 PLAN**. Under **MIRI'S PAPER DISPLAY PLAN**, a broad left box says **WALL PANEL — Plan: two large cards**. A broad right box says **TABLE — Plan: one broad empty card box**. Bottom: “A plan says what Miri intends, not what occurred. No real event, route or access result is supplied.” Tactile route: two large side-by-side regions, WALL PANEL left and TABLE right. Read each as a plan, not an observed layout.

## 3. [Ripple Hall after-note](ripple-after-note.svg) · [PDF](ripple-after-note.pdf)

Title: “Ripple Hall after-note.” Subtitle: “Source C: Nia's attributed fictional report.” Top: **SOURCE C · FICTIONAL DAY 2 NOTE**. Main: **NIA writes:** “I saw two large paper cards on the WALL PANEL: one curved-line card and one dot card.” Bottom: “This is Nia's invented report, not our own visit. It says nothing about the planned table box.” Tactile route: one REPORT panel and a separate UNKNOWN TABLE BOX panel. The class did not visit any place.

## 4. [Two Ripple Hall views](ripple-views.svg) · [PDF](ripple-views.pdf)

Title: “Two Ripple Hall views.” Subtitle: “Sources D and E: Nia and Tao differ.” Top: **SOURCES D AND E · IMAGINED VIEWS**. Upper broad region **NIA says:** “I liked seeing the curved-line card on the wall panel.” Lower broad region **TAO says:** “I would rather have a large card on the table to look at.” Last box: “Two fictional views; neither speaks for everyone.” Tactile route: Nia above Tao in two large panels. Tao's wish is not a report that a table card was displayed.

## 5. [Invitation to report trail](source-sequence-mat.svg) · [PDF](source-sequence-mat.pdf)

Title: “Invitation to report trail.” Subtitle: “Four broad source-sequence fields.” Intro: “Sort what was invited, planned, reported and unknown.” Four stacked blank fields with writing lines: **DAY 1 INVITATION · A** — “What did A invite people to?”; **DAY 1 PLAN · B** — “What did Miri intend to place?”; **DAY 2 REPORT · C** — “What did Nia say she saw?”; **STILL UNKNOWN** — “What was not reported or checked?” Tactile route: four broad strips from top to bottom; A and B share Story Day 1, so do not invent their within-day order.

## 6. [Place story and care mat](place-care-mat.svg) · [PDF](place-care-mat.pdf)

Title: “Place story and care mat.” Subtitle: “View, proposal and unknown stay separate.” Intro: “Say whose words they are and what is still unknown.” Four stacked blank fields: **SOURCE / FEATURE** — “What does an exact source say or show?”; **WHOSE VIEW?** — “Nia, Tao, or another source?”; **POSSIBLE CARE MESSAGE** — “What could be tried with approval?”; **RESULT NOT YET SHOWN** — “What would need a real check?” Tactile route: four large horizontal regions, one spoken or marked response each. Do not treat a proposal as evidence of change.

## 7. [Check A: Cloud Room](check-a-cloud-room.svg) · [PDF](check-a-cloud-room.pdf)

Title: “Check A: Cloud Room.” Subtitle: “Three new fictional sources; plan versus report.” Top: **FRESH CHECK A · FICTIONAL CLOUD ROOM**. Source 1, **STORY DAY 1 INVITATION:** “Tomorrow we plan to show large shape cards in Cloud Room.” Source 2, **STORY DAY 1 PLAN:** “Put cards on the BLUE RAIL and an empty broad box on the TABLE.” Source 3, **STORY DAY 2 NOTE:** **SOL writes:** “I saw one triangle card on the blue rail.” Last line: “The note does not mention the table box.” Tactile route: three large source strips in printed order; Sources 1/2 share Day 1 and Source 3 is Day 2. The separate [learner questions](../STUDENT-CHECKS.md#check-a--day-35--cloud-room-source-trail) do not need a visual page.

## 8. [Check B: Quiet Card Nook](check-b-quiet-card-nook.svg) · [PDF](check-b-quiet-card-nook.pdf)

Title: “Check B: Quiet Card Nook.” Subtitle: “New drawing, plan and attributed views.” Top: **FRESH CHECK B · FICTIONAL QUIET CARD NOOK**. Source 1 DRAWING has two broad side-by-side regions: a wide tabletop with two legs labelled **WIDE TABLE** on the LEFT, and a long rectangular **LABEL STRIP** on the RIGHT. The line below reads “WIDE TABLE LEFT · LABEL STRIP RIGHT. No box is drawn.” Source 2 MAKER'S PLAN: “We could add one broad card box.” Source 3 **UMI says:** “I like the label strip.” Source 4 **DEX says:** “I would like a card box on the table.” Last line: “No added box or real result is shown.” Tactile route: left/right broad drawing regions with a tabletop on the left and one horizontal strip on the right, then three separate plan/speaker strips. Keep the proposed box absent from the drawing. The [learner questions](../STUDENT-CHECKS.md#check-b--day-40--quiet-card-nook) can be read aloud.

Every page footers state “SubjectNest original Foundation HASS W7–8 · CC BY 4.0.” DejaVu typeface rights are in the [font licence](DEJAVU-FONT-LICENSE.txt); no font binary is distributed.