# Desk walkthrough · educator, learner, family and potential funder

**Educator desk run, not classroom evidence.** I laid out A's three feature icons and deliberately asked a question it cannot answer (“Does everyone feel calm?”). Day 103 worked only when content and permission had separate tokens; combining them hid the target. Day 104's Fin card permits one exact fictional sentence, not a broad paraphrase. Day 106's three-way sort makes a supported feature fact, a waiting quotation and an unsupported all-visitors claim visible. Day 107 can be run without a physical map or real display. The Day 105 and 110 cases use unseen features/people and keep their worked key in `teacher/`. A teacher still needs to schedule actual HASS time and assess authentic knowledge elsewhere.

**Learner desk simulation, not a child result.** I tried pointing to two feature icons, hearing A read, and moving raised feature/status cards. In Check A I could say “Paz lists an oval table; Nola likes it; Nola was not asked for public quotation.” In Check B I could build a guide with the general feature list and Miko's permitted exact sentence while leaving Dara's declined sentence off. These are adult simulations; real child comprehension, access and engagement remain untested. A private, quiet, tactile, AAC or scribed route can express the same decision without public speaking.

**Family/carer desk pass.** Every bridge is short and optional, with no device, purchase, home source, translation, answer return or adult availability assumed. Missing home participation cannot block the next lesson. A published translation or First Nations language version would need competent language/cultural review; none is supplied here.

**Potential funder desk pass.** The pack visibly includes ten timed scripts, 30 access routes, 20 worked transfers, 10 family options, eight original A4 pairs, two independent public checks with separate key, exact ACARA/QCAA pins, rights/source ledger and SHA-256 receipt. That supports an authored draft completeness and reproducibility claim. It does **not** show children learned, teachers saved time, a public guide was safe in a real building, a community approved a source, consent was obtained, accessibility worked for every child, or a school year is covered. Those require actual use, permissions and evaluated evidence.

**Self-critique and next revision:** The activity adds a useful audience/consent question to HASS source sharing, but fictional permissions could be mistaken for real approvals. The sources and lessons repeat that boundary; a school reviewer should still test the wording. The icons are feature illustrations, not a wayfinding map, so teachers must not use them as directions. The pack has no authentic K01–K04 evidence or classroom trial. User review should precede any 10/10 claim.