# Separate public teacher key · after first responses

This is feedback for next teaching, not a whole-term or whole-year HPE judgment. Credit an accurate answer through a language the adult actually understands, sign, AAC, pointing, adult scribe or a private route. Record reading/access support separately from any content cue. Never infer a child moved or consented from a paper answer. A real concern follows school policy immediately.

## Day 45 · Case L

**Question 1.** Four dots are labelled PATH and two STAY, but they count six **illustrator-made paper dots**. The first puppet's claim is unsupported because the illustrator explicitly says no child chose a route or played. Do not score a child on numeral reading alone; pointing to four versus two with the correct source distinction is sufficient for this HPE reasoning.

**Question 2.** Many invitations work. For example: “Would you like a suitable small action, a checked stay-in-place choice, a rest, or to pass?” Credit a real choice, accessible stop/rest and respectful acceptance of “not now.” A paper puppet's answer is rehearsal, not a real person's permission. Do not require a child to name or defend an access need.

**Question 3.** A locally responsible adult would need an approved setting, genuine child choice and a dated observation of the child's exact action and support. Fair-play evidence also needs the actual agreed rule and what the child did in a real activity. Outdoor participation needs an actual approved outdoor/natural setting and observed child action. The fictional board supplies none: **PHYSICAL ACTIVITY NOT OBSERVED** and **OUTDOOR PHYSICAL ACTIVITY NOT OBSERVED** from this case.

**Next teaching:** If paper tokens are read as real children, place PAPER beside the board and show an empty ACTUAL record. If consent is treated as permanent, rehearse a fresh ask and respectful no in a different fictional setting.

## Day 50 · Case M

**Question 1.** FIRST has one turn box and FINISH. SECOND has two wide turn boxes, REST and FINISH. The maker says they added a second choice and rest because the first paper drawing lacked a rest place. FINISH remains the goal. Credit clear pointing to changed and unchanged marks.

**Question 2.** The puppet's real-play praise is **unsupported**: the source explicitly says **NO REAL GAME WAS TRIED** and records no response. A child might propose a STOP box, an ask-before-shared-space rule or another suitable action option; credit a fair reason and keep the goal. Do not require the key's example.

**Question 3.** Before an optional actual try, the adult checks local space/equipment/weather if relevant, consent, access, rest, stop cue and supervision. Record date, setting, exact child action, support, agreed rule and what was truly observed; report outdoor only if it occurred outdoors. The card alone shows paper revision, not child physical participation, fair-play conduct, a successful improvement or progress across the term. Without a real event: **PHYSICAL ACTIVITY NOT OBSERVED**.

**Next teaching:** If the child invents audience praise, compare maker intention with actual evidence. If a new rule is proposed but no reason is given, revisit Source E's source → change → unknown effect chain. Continue the school's broader HPE evidence collection rather than promoting this one check to a term rating.