SubjectNest · A place's care story

Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Day 26 — A place can change with the weatherYear 1 HASS · T1 W5–6 · Teacher · Teacher / Day 26

Resource Weeks 05–06 · flexible 25-minute offer; select a smaller part and fit the actual HASS allocation.

O4 complete card

Child start · Home offer · Extra project.

Purpose/product: A small source-based weather/care comparison with a question, not guessed local weather or generic watering advice. K04/S02/S03/S05/S06. Prepare O4, two blank panels and broad dry/wet/source word slips. No soil/water experiment, forecast, outdoors or plant-maintenance job is required.

Invite 3: “What changed in these two notes? What did the people do or plan?” Model 5: O4 says Monday wet soil and path use; Tuesday dry soil and a question to the caretaker. A plan to ask and a missing reply do not establish actual watering. The stated source conditions belong to that invented garden; never prescribe watering for every species or place.

Guide/own 10: Reconstruct the two source situations and keep action, planned question and unknown reply distinct. Let the child choose a useful future care question for this model. If a current classroom/weather observation is offered, date/name what actually occurred; it is a separate record with no inferred historical cause.

Three selectable mechanics:

  1. Fold a wet/dry story: Make two source-labelled panels and place a care clue on each; point to the words rather than rely on colour.
  2. Direct a paper route: Represent the invented bed and built path using broad shapes; show source-described path use without walking or touching actual soil. Say whose action is described, not performed by the child.
  3. Make a question-and-unknown card: Dictate/sign/AAC/type a question for the caretaker and mark what the source does/does not answer. The bench cannot send it or invent a reply.

Compare 4: Connect care choice to source conditions, not “always.” Check 3: “Which care did the note describe? What is still a question?” If wet/dry loses source context, reread each date/condition together; if missing becomes no action, contrast O5's explicitly untried plan with O4's unrecorded reply. Target first-check gaps on this unrelated ordinary source as relevant.

Whole practical aid · Complete terms · Complete alternative · Own blank aids · Care Story Bench/paper.

Preparation · Actual capture · Framework and criteria scope. Sources and reuse. Original activity; selected guidance Modified from linked © State of Queensland (QCAA) 2023 under CC BY 4.0 and document exceptions. No official rating or endorsement.

About this resourceReviewed source edition

Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.

Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.

Exact source: 1fe5fcdab4e5ff5bfb915d495f5f00210c946335 · 2026-10-09. Source edition, roles and hashes

Complete source and rights notices

Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.