# Source, fictional-data and rights ledger · checked 29 September 2026

| Authority or asset | What was verified and how it is used |
| --- | --- |
| [QCAA Business General syllabus landing](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/senior/senior-subjects/syllabuses/humanities-social-sciences/business) and [2025 v1.3 official PDF](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior-qce/syllabuses/snr_business_25_syll.pdf) | Current applicable version for 2026+ completion; Unit 1 title, 55h, Topic 1 title/printed pp.14–15 bullet locations, life-cycle overview p.7, SWOT and four criteria pp.8–9, authentic-case expectation p.13, school assessment p.5 and reporting p.12. Read against live official text. We link and reference locations, not reproduce QCAA diagrams, substantial wording, questions or a grading instrument. Recheck version before adoption. |
| [QCAA Business analytical-tool description, printed p.8](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior-qce/syllabuses/snr_business_25_syll.pdf) | Confirms SWOT: internal strengths/weaknesses, external opportunities/threats. Our four-box mat, examples and wording are newly authored. A classification is a case interpretation that must cite a source detail. |
| [QCAA criteria description, printed p.9](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior-qce/syllabuses/snr_business_25_syll.pdf) | Confirms the four curriculum names: competitiveness, effectiveness, efficiency and stakeholder satisfaction. We use a **narrow fictional cost-per-additional-output ratio**, not a claim that the ratio alone constitutes the whole efficiency criterion. |
| [DejaVu font notice](print/FONT-RIGHTS.md) and [installed notice text](print/dejavu-font-copyright.txt) | Generated PDFs embed/subset DejaVu Sans; font rights are separate from the original work. The PDFs are untagged; the text guide supplies reading order. |

**All case material is original fiction:** Harbour Repair Hub, Fold & Field, Route Board, StageKit, Raincheck Radio, Pocket Gallery, Borrow Bench and Page Pop; every name, quote, operating figure, cost, forecast, venue/competitor detail and decision option was authored for this pack. No actual company, community organisation, government enterprise, regulation, market price, salary, demand observation, survey, accessibility result, profit, environmental saving or social impact is asserted. Learner work does not request personal finance or business records. External facts beyond the syllabus are **not needed** to solve any task. The licence on SubjectNest cases does not cover QCAA or DejaVu.

**Arithmetic source and limits:** B baseline 34/40 and target 36/40 require +2. F's fictional 20 slips include 12 positive; options forecast 16 and 15, improvements +4/+3 and narrow $80÷4=$20, $30÷3=$10. G's three-session goal exceeds two available volunteer Saturdays by one and one offered venue Saturday by two. H's 23/30 baseline to option forecasts 28/30 and 26/30 yields +5/+3 and $200÷5=$40, $90÷3=$30. These are exact **classroom arithmetic** from invented inputs, not return-on-investment analysis or business forecasts. A reproducible calculation audit in `verify_pack.py` checks the key against the source figures.

**Licence and review:** Original SubjectNest text, case data and diagrams © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/): credit SubjectNest, link licence, indicate changes. QCAA content remains QCAA's. No third-party image, copied worksheet, financial template, cultural story, translation or real customer data is included. No classroom pilot, specialist accessibility evaluation, authentic-case validation or measured learning impact occurred.