# Desk run-through · Year 11 integrated Weeks 5–6

This is a **desk simulation and local artifact check**, not a classroom trial, learner outcome, accessibility certification, funder endorsement or school approval. Roles were used to find concrete defects before release. Dates, source versions and checks are pinned in the [crosswalk](CURRICULUM-CROSSWALK.md), [ledger](SOURCE-AND-RIGHTS.md), [verifier](verify_pack.py) and [SHA receipt](MANIFEST.sha256).

| Reader/route | Attempted use and challenge | Correction or release boundary |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Teacher preparing Day 21 in five minutes | Could the cropped-hand text make the adult model sound like real legal overtime or take-home pay? | Script and source note separate a stipulated multiplier, base pay, a once-only allowance and **gross model** total. The key leaves awards, deductions and authorship unknown. |
| Teacher marking Day 23 and fresh Check A | A learner says 25% for both mark-up and margin. Is there a prompt that reveals the misconception without simply supplying an answer? | The [base mat](print/base-comparison.pdf), text route and key put the same dollar gap over COST and SALE separately. The check uses fresh values; the public key supplies a next question. |
| Learner choosing a mode mid-task | Can a learner switch from a visual bar to spoken/tactile work and still reach the same target? | The [learner instructions](LEARNER.md) require maker/audience and choice, model with unit/base, then bounded revision and unknown on **every** A/B/C route. The five full text routes preserve the labels; support is recorded separately. Equivalent outcomes have **not** been measured. |
| Learner without a device or printer | Does Day 24 require JavaScript or a colour printout? | The complete [paper method](interactive/TEXT-ROUTE.md) and labelled tactile route give both worked cases and the reverse-base rule. The five SVG/PDF aids are optional layouts, not gatekeepers. |
| Supporter at home | Is an optional exercise safe to do without a real bill, job, company or subscription? | All ten transfers use invented numbers and paper; the pack asks for no household data or real quote. The supporter can ask “which base?” and move pieces at the learner's direction. |
| Teacher considering Check B | Could it be used as a secure exam or QCAA mark? | Both check sheet and key say **publicly accessible** and **not secure exams**. The case is fresh only relative to this practice and requires a locally new parallel if prior access matters. The three evidence strands are planning observations, not a QCAA standard. |
| School accessibility reviewer | Does visual contrast, PDF text, SVG labelling or the offline tool prove universal access? | Five PDFs were checked as A4 searchable text with embedded DejaVu font and visually inspected. SVG title/description and full text/tactile routes exist. The interactive has labels, focus indication, status output and paper equivalent; local learner testing is still required. |
| Potential funder | Can 350 minutes, two public checks or a successful local verifier be presented as full Unit 1 completion or proven impact? | No. The [crosswalk](CURRICULUM-CROSSWALK.md) states exact partial opportunities, the 14/55-hour comparison, omitted spreadsheet and wider subject matter, school decisions and no outcome claim. The verifier checks **artifacts**, not teaching effectiveness. |

## Local review receipts

- **Curriculum/source:** Official QCAA English 2025 v1.3 and General Mathematics 2025 v1.3 subject pages/PDFs, QCE handbook and ASIC MoneySmart were checked on 29 September 2026. Printed syllabus pages are specified in the crosswalk; QCAA PDF bytes are linked, not redistributed or falsely hashed. Future source freshness requires another check.
- **Arithmetic:** Daily and fresh-check values are independently recomputed with exact decimal arithmetic by `verify_pack.py`; source givens and published key results are cross-checked. Fictional modelling assumptions stay next to each number.
- **Print:** The five A4 PDFs were rendered and visually inspected for clipping, labels and readable order. `pdfinfo`, `pdftotext`, `pdffonts` and deterministic regeneration are verified locally; generated font licensing is separate.
- **Offline tool:** Browser checks cover both complete worked cases, invalid bounds, mobile viewport, local-only requests and the plain-paper equivalent. It is a learning model, not a live price service or spreadsheet claim.
- **Navigation/rights:** The verifier checks local Markdown fragments, file links, HTML links, original-resource rights notices and every authored-file SHA. A clean pass is required after any edit.

**Original resource rights:** © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, SubjectNest, [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Credit author, source, licence and changes.