# Source, fact and reuse ledger

Checked **29 September 2026**. These links are **references**, not embedded extracts. Specific current law must be rechecked when teaching a live issue. Short classroom paraphrases below are ours, not official wording.

| ID | Primary/institutional source and exact use | Temporal and rights boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | [QCAA Legal Studies General senior syllabus 2025 v1.3, January 2026](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/downloads/senior-qce/syllabuses/snr_legal_25_syll.pdf), printed pp. 4–5, 11–15, 28–42. Unit, Topic 1 concepts and assessment holds. [Current landing page](https://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/senior/senior-subjects/syllabuses/humanities-social-sciences/legal-studies) names v1.3. | QCAA content is linked/paraphrased, not relicensed or endorsed. Recheck version. |
| P1 | [Parliamentary Education Office, rule of law](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/system-of-government/rule-of-law). Equality before law, accessible law, fair enforcement and presumption of innocence. | Institutional explanation, not our artwork/text. |
| P2 | [Parliamentary Education Office, separation of powers](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/system-of-government/separation-of-powers-parliament-executive-and-judiciary). Legislative, executive and judicial power, with responsible government nuance. | Institutional explanation; our three-column aid is original. |
| P3 | [Parliamentary Education Office, exclusive/residual/concurrent powers](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/your-questions-on-notice/questions/what-is-the-difference-between-exclusive-residual-and-concurrent-law-making-powers). Examples and Constitution ss 107, 109. | Do not equate power allocation with an offence's precise legislative source. |
| QP1 | [Queensland Parliament, Making of a Law factsheet](https://documents.parliament.qld.gov.au/explore/education/factsheets/Factsheet_3.7_MakingOfALaw.pdf). Queensland bill, scrutiny, passage, assent. | The factsheet is linked only. A model bill in this pack has no legal force. |
| QC1 | [Queensland Courts, Magistrates](https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/the-courts/magistrates-court/about-the-magistrates-court), [District](https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/the-courts/district-court/about-the-district-court), [Supreme Trial Division](https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/the-courts/supreme-court/About-the-Supreme-Court-Trial-Division), and [legal glossary](https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/services-and-online-actions/advice-and-support/glossary-of-legal-terms). Introductory Queensland criminal court order, jurisdiction and adversarial term. | Court pages may change; do not turn classroom hierarchy into individual legal advice. |
| L1 | [Queensland Criminal Code Act 1899, authorised current PDF](https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/inforce/current/act-1899-009). Example of actual Queensland statute/code and verification route. | No offence element/penalty is copied into a synthetic case. Check date of current compilation. |
| L2 | [Queensland Acts Interpretation Act 1954, authorised current PDF](https://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/view/pdf/inforce/current/act-1954-003), s 14A. Purpose-oriented interpretation; s 14A(2) says that rule does not create or extend criminal liability. | The Day 8 classroom clause is **invented**. Recheck current provision before real interpretation. |
| A1 | [Australian Law Reform Commission, Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws (Report 31), summary](https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/recognition-of-aboriginal-customary-laws-alrc-report-31/) (1986). Institutional historic account: diverse dynamic laws, limited/uneven recognition and First Nations authority over consultation. | A historic report is **not** current or local community testimony. Do not fabricate or copy community laws. Contemporary, community-approved voices needed. |
| A2 | [Australian Law Reform Commission, Policy landscape](https://www.alrc.gov.au/publication/managing-discovery-discovery-of-documents-in-federal-courts-alrc-report-115/2-framework-for-reform/policy-landscape/) describes adversarial/inquisitorial as broad models and warns that the labels have no simple precise meaning. | The report discusses civil procedure; we use only its cautious general distinction, alongside the Queensland Courts glossary, not a claim about another country's criminal courts. |

**Originality and rights:** The ten scripts, fictional cards, two new checks, twenty example swaps, five diagrams, text equivalents and teacher responses were generated for SubjectNest. No QCAA pages, PEO figures, statute text, court diagrams, photographs or Indigenous cultural material are embedded. Original pack content © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). External source copyrights and official conditions are separate. [DejaVu font rights](print/FONT-RIGHTS.md) apply to the embedded print font. This is an educational model and has not undergone classroom pilot, independent legal, cultural, translation or specialist accessibility review.