Staff criteria — The Hazel Garden leaflet

Complete supplied source

Entirely made-up garden leaflet says “The pond disappeared in 2025, so nobody can visit.” Record H, written 2025, states the pond remained and a timber viewing deck was added in 2021 because organisers wanted a place from which to view the pond. It supplies no current opening or individual visitor response. Fictional reader Sal wants to know what stayed and what changed. Fictional reader Arun wants a clear spoken account with a source. Proposed action C replaces the unsupported pond/availability line with a source-correct deck/pond line and a spoken companion. Action D keeps the words but makes the page colourful. Neither is an actual user test.

Question-specific criteria, examples and next teaching

1. Which leaflet claims does record H support or not support? Show the clues.

Pond remains; deck added 2021; 2025 is record date; no current visit availability given. Next: invented garden leaflet says a stream vanished in 2024; record written 2024 says bridge added in 2020 over the existing stream and no opening detail. Compare claim to record without inventing status.

2. Suggest a useful change for Sal or Arun and explain why it fits.

C or a well-justified source/retained pond/change/spoken explanation repair responds to Sal/Arun; colour alone does not correct facts. Next: invented library label has a missing event/source; reader wants to hear when seats changed; provide useful spoken/dictated source line without a fixed learning-style label.

3. Give a possible help and a possible difficulty of your change. What hasn't been tried?

Possible clearer change/continuity/source; possible longer reading/explanation time or layout; untried here. Next: fictional hall note suggests more text plus larger labels, with no trial; consider a focused possible benefit/difficulty and private check.

4. Make a short source-correct account and a question that could check its meaning.

E.g. “H reports the pond stayed and a deck was added in 2021; H was written 2025.” Question checks retained pond/new deck/source-date meaning, not present-day access. Next: invented market record says original shed remains and rack added 2016; create a bounded account and focused question, recording actual self-check or willing feedback only if it happens.

Eligibility

Full D prerequisites; no pond visit or deck-access task. After assessment, teach the missed component with an unrelated source before selecting another eligible source. Staff records actual response/support/source/next instruction; a learner's declined own sheet remains empty and is not fabricated evidence.

These are formative original component criteria, not automatic A–E conversions. Accept justified source-bound alternatives without requiring model wording. Preserve the actual response, support and first/later interval/exposure.

Source · Empty own work · Capture and next teaching.

Sources and reuse. Original educational work © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0. Selected guidance Modified from linked © State of Queensland (QCAA) 2023, CC BY 4.0 with document exceptions; see the complete notice.