C-later · source page1
Complete original fictional path-display diagram account. Trial1 uses the same printed centimetre scale and base direction for drawn strips UandV: Uspans0–4cm; Vspans0–7cm. Before this supplied diagram comparison, the fictional helper predicted V’s drawn base would be longer using its visible longer-looking outline. Trial2’s note says Uwas read along a different diagonal direction, but supplies no length. The reader job is an accurate base-length display, not choosing the strongest paving rock. Real rocks, walking performance and material hardness are not tested. A separate proposed actual plain-paper comparison would align a familiar ruler zero, read the same base direction and record actual cm readings; no new outcome is supplied.
C-later · question page2 of5
1. Compare the supplied trial1 bases with unit and drawing-only scope.
Paper stays yours; no digital action erases it.
C-later · question page3 of5
2. Compare trial1’s supplied result with the helper’s explicit before prediction, without calling it your own prior prediction.
Paper stays yours; no digital action erases it.
C-later · question page4 of5
3. Keep two faithful trial1 rows and explain why trial2 cannot complete the same base comparison.
Paper stays yours; no digital action erases it.
C-later · question page5 of5
4. With guidance, give one fairer base-reading plan step and one further question, leaving the new result open.
Paper stays yours; no digital action erases it.