# Eight neutral whole sources, exact prompts and blank own records ## Id A-first ## Title Parcel-stage fold card ## Source kind Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied. ## Complete neutral source Complete original fictional parcel-stage account. The maker needs a bendable display card for a curved sign, not a real food wrapper. PackageK names aluminium foil. Supplied observation at the story table: K has a visible fold and can be bent into the drawn curve. F1 describes bauxite as a common ore in the industrial aluminium-making route and thin rolled foil as a use of aluminium. No ore processing was observed at this table, no mine/manufacturer is named, and the sign has not been tried outdoors or by an actual parcel reader. A separate unlabelled shiny drawingJ gives no material identity. The maker wants a useful resource/property/job note and a new question. ## Four exact prompts - Name one supplied property of K and the source that links its named material to an Earth resource. - Separate what the story-table observer recorded from what F1 describes. - For the curved-sign job, offer a choice using a clue and say what remains untried. - Ask one useful new question for the maker, leaving its result open. ## Four own initial values - - - - ## Whole source and paper door Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help. ## Id B-first ## Title Tree-pot viewing card ## Source kind Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied. ## Complete neutral source Complete original fictional tree-pot viewing account. A sealed display sketch P shows brown particles, two leaf pieces and spaces. Its picture window shows no visible animal; organism identity/count, nutrients, water movement and plant growth are not measured. F3 describes soil roles in supporting plants, providing habitat and regulating water. That general account is not a result from this display or proof that a particular pot cleans drinking water. The visitor’s job is to understand two useful soil roles and a view-level limit. A possible later observation plan would keep the sealed display closed, use the same view/window and record visible features; no observation has yet been conducted by the child. ## Four exact prompts - Name two visible features supplied in P, without adding an unseen organism. - Use F3 to describe one soil role and say what P does not establish about that role. - What local organism or water result remains unknown in this account? - With a scaffold, suggest one safe planned viewing step and one thing to keep similar for a new view comparison. ## Four own initial values - - - - ## Whole source and paper door Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help. ## Id C-first ## Title Display ledge diagram ## Source kind Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied. ## Complete neutral source Complete original fictional display-ledge diagram account. Drawn labelled bases M and N use a printed centimetre scale from zero with equal1cm intervals. M spans0–3cm; N spans0–5cm. Those are supplied diagram readings, not dimensions of real rocks or the child’s own ruler measurements. The diagram records no prior prediction. Its display-reader job is to compare these two drawn bases accurately. A separate new plain-paper measuring plan could ask which chosen paper base is longer, use a familiar centimetre ruler with zero aligned and the same base direction, and keep an actual prediction before its own measurement. No new paper result is supplied. ## Four exact prompts - Compare the two supplied drawn base lengths with their unit and a real-object limit. - Is a before-measurement prediction supplied here? Explain using the account. - Make two matching record rows for M and N with supplied base length and source/unit. - With guidance, propose one suitable ruler-reading step for the separate new paper plan and keep its result open. ## Four own initial values - - - - ## Whole source and paper door Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help. ## Id D-first ## Title Garden-monitor planning card ## Source kind Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied. ## Complete neutral source Complete original fictional garden-monitor planning account. The plan’s invented legend says triangle = review the water plan now; circle = review already logged. At09:00 trayP shows triangle; trayQ shows circle. The next record at10:00 is empty. The plan is to check the written water record when triangle appears; neither symbol measures water content or proves irrigation success. F4 separately describes CSIRO research using soil-water information to support farmer decisions, on a page last updated16November2022. No CSIRO sensor, real garden outcome or actual child measurement appears here. Fictional readerR says “Pneeds a review”; fictional readerS says “all future work is complete”. Those are story views, not real peer opinions. Job: explain a present record and a useful next evidence question. ## Four exact prompts - Use one supplied symbol/record to explain the plan’s current decision, without inventing later success. - Separate F4’s general provider example from the fictional monitor card. - Compare the two fictional reader views with the supplied record and keep their status clear. - Ask a further evidence question for the plan reader, leaving its actual result open. ## Four own initial values - - - - ## Whole source and paper door Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help. ## Id A-later ## Title Festival repair-label source ## Source kind Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied. ## Complete neutral source Complete original fictional festival repair-display account. A wire-loop drawingL has a copper label; the story observer records it as coiled with two visible ends. F2 describes copper’s electrical conduction and its use in wiring. No conductivity test or powered circuit is present. The reader job is a factual wire-display explanation, not instructions to repair electricity. Another objectM has no material label. No mine, manufacturer, real repair-reader feedback or performance result is supplied. The maker wants to keep observed form, provider property/use and an open question separate. ## Four exact prompts - Name one supplied visible property of L and one provider-supported property/use link. - Separate the observer’s supplied form note from F2’s conduction knowledge and the absent test. - Give a source-qualified message for the factual-display reader using a relevant clue and a limit. - Ask one purpose-linked new question whose actual answer is not supplied. ## Four own initial values - - - - ## Whole source and paper door Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help. ## Id B-later ## Title Planter record window ## Source kind Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied. ## Complete neutral source Complete original fictional planter-window account. SketchQ shows pale particles, one root-shaped drawing and spaces; no organism is identified. A supplied water notebook compares samplesQ andR using the same20mL input, cup/filter arrangement and2minute collection window: Qcollected5mL and Rcollected9mL in trial1. It supplies no repeated trials, plant growth, local soil type or drinking-water safety. F3 describes general soil roles for plants, organisms and water; that reference does not identify Q’s actual organisms or prove these setups clean water. The reader job is a useful soil-role and record caption. A new safe viewing plan would leave the display sealed and record the same window area. ## Four exact prompts - Give two supplied visible features of Q, retaining what is not identified. - Connect one F3 soil role to this reader job and give one record-level limit. - Compare the supplied trial1 collected-water records with units and state a different result they do not provide. - With a scaffold, propose one safe similar-view step for a further feature comparison and leave its outcome open. ## Four own initial values - - - - ## Whole source and paper door Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help. ## Id C-later ## Title Path-display comparison sheet ## Source kind Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied. ## Complete neutral source Complete original fictional path-display diagram account. Trial1 uses the same printed centimetre scale and base direction for drawn strips UandV: Uspans0–4cm; Vspans0–7cm. Before this supplied diagram comparison, the fictional helper predicted V’s drawn base would be longer using its visible longer-looking outline. Trial2’s note says Uwas read along a different diagonal direction, but supplies no length. The reader job is an accurate base-length display, not choosing the strongest paving rock. Real rocks, walking performance and material hardness are not tested. A separate proposed actual plain-paper comparison would align a familiar ruler zero, read the same base direction and record actual cm readings; no new outcome is supplied. ## Four exact prompts - Compare the supplied trial1 bases with unit and drawing-only scope. - Compare trial1’s supplied result with the helper’s explicit before prediction, without calling it your own prior prediction. - Keep two faithful trial1 rows and explain why trial2 cannot complete the same base comparison. - With guidance, give one fairer base-reading plan step and one further question, leaving the new result open. ## Four own initial values - - - - ## Whole source and paper door Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help. ## Id D-later ## Title Resource-trail visitor record ## Source kind Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied. ## Complete neutral source Complete original fictional resource-trail visitor account. The display has a supplied soil-water notebook with sampleAcollected6mL and sampleBcollected10mL after the same20mL addition, same cup/filter setup and2minute window in trial1. It supplies no repeats or drinking-water/plant-growth results. A plan reader wants a caption comparing only this recorded collection. F3 separately describes general soil water/habitat/plant roles; it is not these samples’ local result. Fictional readerM says “Bcollected more in this record”; fictional readerN says “Bwill always grow plants better”. No real visitor has replied. A proposed next record would examine a named missing question; its result is empty. ## Four exact prompts - Use a supplied record to give a bounded explanation for the caption job. - Separate F3’s general role from these particular fictional collection records and their missing outcomes. - Compare the two fictional reader claims with the complete record, without treating them as actual peer feedback. - Ask one useful further evidence question for this accurate caption, leaving its result open. ## Four own initial values - - - - ## Whole source and paper door Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help.