SubjectNest · Year 3 Science · Term 1 · Weeks 09–10 · sequence Days 41–50

D-first · Staff evidence and next teachingYear 3 Science · T1 W9–10 · Teacher · Teacher / Cases / D first

Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Use this case

Offer the neutral source and four questions after the relevant learning opportunity. Keep staff examples and next teaching on the teacher pages.

Child materials and paper

After reviewing the child’s own work

Choose the relevant next lesson. These are supported teaching accounts, separate from the child’s case responses.

Complete neutral source

Complete original fictional garden-monitor planning account. The plan’s invented legend says triangle = review the water plan now; circle = review already logged. At09:00 trayP shows triangle; trayQ shows circle. The next record at10:00 is empty. The plan is to check the written water record when triangle appears; neither symbol measures water content or proves irrigation success. F4 separately describes CSIRO research using soil-water information to support farmer decisions, on a page last updated16November2022. No CSIRO sensor, real garden outcome or actual child measurement appears here. Fictional readerR says “Pneeds a review”; fictional readerS says “all future work is complete”. Those are story views, not real peer opinions. Job: explain a present record and a useful next evidence question.

Components

Acceptance

Other source-faithful responses in words/drawing/spoken/signed/AAC/exact scribing are legitimate. Apply only this prompt and criterion; no unstated physical action, measured result, word quota or exact model wording. Record actual support and source exposure.

Exact criterion

One exact legend+tray record linked to review/already-logged plan; future outcome unknown.

Exact prompt

Use one supplied symbol/record to explain the plan’s current decision, without inventing later success.

Full unrelated next lesson

Child invitation

Give a craft-shelf decision with the actual supplied code and an open result.

Four teacher moves

  • Read the entire new source with its names, times, conditions and unknowns. Ask one initial meaning question before showing the staff possibility. Let the child ask to hear the whole source again or pass.
  • Model the exact legend→entry→plan link and keep later work separate from present decision.
  • Read the complete different guided account below. Guide one heading or source location, then pause for the child to make their own distinction. Keep the original worked example separate; no model sentence is inserted into their own work.
  • Invite the exact child job below. Record the observable distinction, actual source, mode, support and any unperformed work. Give feedback about one chosen clue, then decide whether another unrelated new opportunity is useful.

Guided different complete source

Different fictional craft-shelf code says stripe = sort plan needs review, dot = review logged. BoxA’s present entry is stripe; later entry is blank. Invite the child to explain its current plan decision and later limit.

Id

N13

Mode limit

These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.

Next decision

If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.

Observable evidence

Child links particular coded data to the supplied explanation/need while preserving missing future performance.

Ordinary staff possible model

L’s star supports reviewing its label under this code; later completion is not supplied.

Teacher preparation

Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.

Title

Library-log decision trail

Whole unrelated source

Fictional book-display legend says star = label needs review, square = review logged. At12:00 shelfL shows star, shelfM square;12:30 is blank.

Id

D-first-1

Initial own value

One staff possible response

P’s triangle at09:00 means review the plan now under this fictional legend; the10:00 result is empty.

Acceptance

Other source-faithful responses in words/drawing/spoken/signed/AAC/exact scribing are legitimate. Apply only this prompt and criterion; no unstated physical action, measured result, word quota or exact model wording. Record actual support and source exposure.

Exact criterion

CSIRO general research example and invented present tray code distinguished; no actual sensor/readings claimed.

Exact prompt

Separate F4’s general provider example from the fictional monitor card.

Full unrelated next lesson

Child invitation

Help a theatre reader distinguish guide knowledge from the paper plan.

Four teacher moves

  • Read the entire new source with its names, times, conditions and unknowns. Ask one initial meaning question before showing the staff possibility. Let the child ask to hear the whole source again or pass.
  • Model Provider/story reference versus Supplied model lanes, preserving which information comes from each.
  • Read the complete different guided account below. Guide one heading or source location, then pause for the child to make their own distinction. Keep the original worked example separate; no model sentence is inserted into their own work.
  • Invite the exact child job below. Record the observable distinction, actual source, mode, support and any unperformed work. Give feedback about one chosen clue, then decide whether another unrelated new opportunity is useful.

Guided different complete source

Different fictional theatre guide says written cues can organise a show. A paper scene-plan drawing has no performed-show record. Ask the child to separate general guide information and this model’s evidence.

Id

N14

Mode limit

These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.

Next decision

If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.

Observable evidence

Child keeps reference knowledge, model and particular event levels distinct.

Ordinary staff possible model

The reference gives a general planning role; the toy map does not prove a journey happened.

Teacher preparation

Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.

Title

General route information and a toy map

Whole unrelated source

Fictional transport reference card says the story’s maps can help plan routes. A separate toy-map drawing has an invented path; no actual journey is recorded.

Id

D-first-2

Initial own value

One staff possible response

F4 describes provider research; our triangle/circle card is invented and is not CSIRO’s sensor or data.

Acceptance

Other source-faithful responses in words/drawing/spoken/signed/AAC/exact scribing are legitimate. Apply only this prompt and criterion; no unstated physical action, measured result, word quota or exact model wording. Record actual support and source exposure.

Exact criterion

R's presentP review view grounded; S's future-complete view unsupported by emptynext record; fictional readers not actualpeer comparison.

Exact prompt

Compare the two fictional reader views with the supplied record and keep their status clear.

Full unrelated next lesson

Child invitation

Compare the toy-library views without inventing borrower feedback.

Four teacher moves

  • Read the entire new source with its names, times, conditions and unknowns. Ask one initial meaning question before showing the staff possibility. Let the child ask to hear the whole source again or pass.
  • Model comparison by tracing each view to the complete supplied notebook and naming the empty audience evidence.
  • Read the complete different guided account below. Guide one heading or source location, then pause for the child to make their own distinction. Keep the original worked example separate; no model sentence is inserted into their own work.
  • Invite the exact child job below. Record the observable distinction, actual source, mode, support and any unperformed work. Give feedback about one chosen clue, then decide whether another unrelated new opportunity is useful.

Guided different complete source

Different fictional toy-library notebook says one card printed, actual borrower-use entry blank. Story readersM says printed and N says every borrower understood it. Invite the child to compare both views with source and retain their fiction status.

Id

N15

Mode limit

These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.

Next decision

If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.

Observable evidence

Child compares supplied views to evidence, preserves source limits and does not claim a real peer interaction.

Ordinary staff possible model

A matches the placement record; B invents visitor success from an empty row. These are fictional views.

Teacher preparation

Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.

Title

Festival-record two viewpoints

Whole unrelated source

Fictional festival notebook reports one sign placed; tomorrow’s visitor-use row is blank. Story readerA says a sign was placed; readerB says all visitors found the booth.

Id

D-first-3

Initial own value

One staff possible response

R fits P’s present triangle. S’s future-complete claim is unsupported because10:00 is empty; both readers are fictional.

Acceptance

Other source-faithful responses in words/drawing/spoken/signed/AAC/exact scribing are legitimate. Apply only this prompt and criterion; no unstated physical action, measured result, word quota or exact model wording. Record actual support and source exposure.

Exact criterion

Purpose-linked new monitoring/record/review question, actual result open; no real experiment or success required.

Exact prompt

Ask a further evidence question for the plan reader, leaving its actual result open.

Full unrelated next lesson

Child invitation

Ask a useful puzzle-guide question and leave the reply open.

Four teacher moves

  • Read the entire new source with its names, times, conditions and unknowns. Ask one initial meaning question before showing the staff possibility. Let the child ask to hear the whole source again or pass.
  • Model a next question tied to the instruction job without filling the answer or forcing participation.
  • Read the complete different guided account below. Guide one heading or source location, then pause for the child to make their own distinction. Keep the original worked example separate; no model sentence is inserted into their own work.
  • Invite the exact child job below. Record the observable distinction, actual source, mode, support and any unperformed work. Give feedback about one chosen clue, then decide whether another unrelated new opportunity is useful.

Guided different complete source

Different fictional puzzle display has a start arrow but no reader feedback. Invite one useful question for its guide, with optional imagined reader clearly labelled imagined.

Id

N16

Mode limit

These are supported teaching opportunities after component review. Reasoning from a supplied account, a model and actual child conduct are different evidence. A helper operation is attributed; declining, length or format is not an ability diagnosis or grade.

Next decision

If this distinction is still unclear, return to one source-labelled heading pair in this new account and one question. If clear, offer a genuinely fresh ordinary job after further learning. Do not rehearse the held key and call its repetition untouched first/later evidence.

Observable evidence

Child gives a purpose-linked question while preserving actual-feedback and future-result gaps.

Ordinary staff possible model

Which step would a willing user find first? No reply or successful use exists.

Teacher preparation

Read the complete new source and different guided account below; prepare large paper headings and a genuinely empty own response area. The accounts are original supplied fiction, not a verified local event. Offer spoken/signed/AAC, pointing with confirmed read-back, drawing or verbatim scribing. No specialised equipment, media recording, purchases or public sharing is needed.

Title

Parcel-guide next enquiry

Whole unrelated source

Fictional parcel display has a packing instruction but no user trials. Its maker wants to learn whether the order is clear.

Id

D-first-4

Initial own value

One staff possible response

What would the next record show about whether the written-plan review was logged? That result is not supplied.

Eligibility

Offer only after relevant actual teaching opportunity; first capture/decline precedes its corresponding later source and all staff keys. Record source familiarity, earlier answer exposure, child/adult operations, wording help, mode, actual versus supplied/model evidence and time/order. Coached reuse is teaching, not untouched evidence.

Exact four prompts

Id

D-first

Learner door

Native initially closed same-page complete neutral source disclosure, four exact matching prompts and genuinely empty own spaces. Open/close retains drafts without JS. External full-source reference remains optional; leave/reload may discard memory-only words. Exact paper mat repeats the source identity, whole source and four empty prompts; no criteria/models/next teaching in help.

Own values

Source kind

Original supplied fiction; provider knowledge is separately attributed. No actual child/local trial or reader success supplied.

Title

Garden-monitor planning card
About this resourceReviewed source edition

Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.

Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.

Exact source: 089d6ac9ec4293ea4b949980b0e79e5cbf08fc82 · 2026-10-13. Source edition, roles and hashes

Complete source and rights notices

Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.