# Educator desk · C-first · A dated maintenance-status record

Hold until first response capture; public sources are not presumed unseen. Record actual support and known exposure. Component notes are not QCAA grades.

## Whole source and exact prompts

Original invented C1 record about Juniper Model Park bench:3 July 2027 inspection requested;5 July 2027 request acknowledged;8 July 2027 an inspection planned for 10 July. No inspection or repair completed entry. Fiction only: no actual hazard, manager message, safe-to-use instruction or learner request. Date gaps in an illustration are not measured timeline spacing.

1. Put the three entries in date order and identify one status word.
2. Does the record show the bench was inspected or repaired? Use a source detail.
3. What useful question would guide finding the next status?
4. Present a short update for someone reviewing this record, with one limit and possible next response.

## Component criteria and matched next teaching

**Component C-first-1: Put the three entries in date order and identify one status word.**

Original criterion/acceptable meaning: 3 July requested,5 July acknowledged,8 July planned; identifies status accurately.

Mark only actual observed component: supported / developing with stated support / not yet observed. These are descriptive task notes, not QCAA grades. Alternative justified proposals welcome.

**Matching next entrance C-first-1:** Find dates first, then exact status words; physical card order is not date order. Give after first capture; preserve first response and later help separately. Missing reply/actual event stays missing.

**Unrelated next teaching C-first-1 — after first capture.**

**New supplied account.** Three fictional model-display notes are deliberately presented out of order: 19 May 2028, check planned for 21 May; 12 May, check requested; 15 May, request acknowledged. There is no completed-check note.

**Teacher move.** Arrange the actual dated notes, then attach their exact status words. Spaces between cards do not measure elapsed time.

**Learner invitation.** Put the three entries in order and explain one status word.

**Staff worked possibility.** 12 May requested, 15 May acknowledged, 19 May planned. For example, planned describes an intended check rather than a completed one.

**Next help if useful.** If physical card order is followed, start with just two differently placed dated cards and use month/day information before returning to all three.

Use usual communication and one meaningful part. Keep the first response and later support separate; this teaching adds no criterion and supplies no actual event or required real-world action.

**Component C-first-2: Does the record show the bench was inspected or repaired? Use a source detail.**

Original criterion/acceptable meaning: No completed inspection/repair; planned inspection10 July not completion.

Mark only actual observed component: supported / developing with stated support / not yet observed. These are descriptive task notes, not QCAA grades. Alternative justified proposals welcome.

**Matching next entrance C-first-2:** Compare planned with completed and note absent event record. Give after first capture; preserve first response and later help separately. Missing reply/actual event stays missing.

**Unrelated next teaching C-first-2 — after first capture.**

**New supplied account.** A fictional model planting-table record says a label check was requested on 3 September 2028 and planned for 6 September. No check completion, label repair or actual gardening is recorded.

**Teacher move.** Separate the record's actual words from a proposed event. Use PLAN and COMPLETED RECORD cards without supplying a missing result.

**Learner invitation.** Does the record establish that the labels were checked or repaired? Use a stated detail.

**Staff worked possibility.** No. It records a planned label check, not a completed check or repair. The absence does not prove the check failed either.

**Next help if useful.** If the intended date is treated as completion, compare a fresh pair of fictional notes, one saying planned and one explicitly saying completed, while keeping the original incomplete record intact.

Use usual communication and one meaningful part. Keep the first response and later support separate; this teaching adds no criterion and supplies no actual event or required real-world action.

**Component C-first-3: What useful question would guide finding the next status?**

Original criterion/acceptable meaning: Own enquiry about whether inspection occurred/result/next responsible step; no assumed result or hazard diagnosis.

Mark only actual observed component: supported / developing with stated support / not yet observed. These are descriptive task notes, not QCAA grades. Alternative justified proposals welcome.

**Matching next entrance C-first-3:** Focus question on the missing status rather than every park issue. Give after first capture; preserve first response and later help separately. Missing reply/actual event stays missing.

**Unrelated next teaching C-first-3 — after first capture.**

**New supplied account.** A fictional model book-display record says a check was requested and acknowledged. A later note says a check is planned for Friday. It gives no actual check result or next action.

**Teacher move.** Choose one missing status relevant to this record. Let the learner draft the question through usual communication; no message or result needs to exist.

**Learner invitation.** What question would help find the next status?

**Staff worked possibility.** Did the planned check take place, and is a result recorded? is a useful question. It seeks missing status without assuming a fault, failure or completed repair.

**Next help if useful.** If the question assumes a result, underline its assumption and try a neutral whether/what-status question about a different fictional display.

Use usual communication and one meaningful part. Keep the first response and later support separate; this teaching adds no criterion and supplies no actual event or required real-world action.

**Component C-first-4: Present a short update for someone reviewing this record, with one limit and possible next response.**

Original criterion/acceptable meaning: Accurate current-status update with one source-supported limit and a possible next response. Seeking an update or deferring can be supported; source credit is useful taught practice but is not an extra award condition for this prompt. No public use advice.

Mark only actual observed component: supported / developing with stated support / not yet observed. These are descriptive task notes, not QCAA grades. Alternative justified proposals welcome.

**Matching next entrance C-first-4:** Separate source-backed status from own proposed next check; no invented date promise. Give after first capture; preserve first response and later help separately. Missing reply/actual event stays missing.

**Unrelated next teaching C-first-4 — after first capture.**

**New supplied account.** A fictional model-map board record says: 8 October 2028, review requested; 9 October, acknowledged; review planned for 12 October. It contains no completed review or revision.

**Teacher move.** Separate a short recorded update from a proposed next step. Source credit is useful taught practice, but do not turn an unasked credit requirement into a mark on the original held response.

**Learner invitation.** Give someone a short update, one limit and a possible next response.

**Staff worked possibility.** A review was requested and acknowledged, and is planned for 12 October. Completion is not recorded; ask whether it occurred before reporting a revised board. A credit can be added as optional further practice.

**Next help if useful.** If the proposed check becomes a finished event, sort the update into RECORDED, STILL UNKNOWN and I SUGGEST, then practise with another incomplete model-board note.

Use usual communication and one meaningful part. Keep the first response and later support separate; this teaching adds no criterion and supplies no actual event or required real-world action.

**Conditions note:** edition/date/source exposure; usual communication/source reading/neutral scribing; actual learner decisions versus adult marks; feedback after capture; chosen next move. Use roles only, no diagnoses/names. Record practical event only if it happened. Later interpretation belongs to its exact new source, not presumed memory or calibrated progress.

## Choose a next door

- [After-capture next-teaching menu](../teacher/NEXT.html)
- [This source](../checks/C-first-source.html)
- [Own response](../responses/C-first.html)