# RF1 · Later source and own blank

Unused recommendation recheck, later stage. Only after the captured first response. This complete later source repeats the initial contract and adds a **different new cohort**, not a continuation of the original seedlings. Do not join the two cohorts into a sixteen-day graph. The later reader priority is first disclosed on this page.

## Complete later source

A fictional display committee is comparing two assigned growing-position arrangements, A and B. Each group has six initially labelled bean seedlings, with a supplied starting group mean height of 12 mm. Every final mean includes all six recorded labelled heights, including stems not marked alive; no height is missing. The alive-at-check count is separate. The plan specifies the same seed variety/stage, pots, mix, water schedule and check time; actual temperature, light, moisture and adherence are unrecorded. These constructed records are not a controlled causal finding, actual community consultation, plant care prescription or permission to move/alter living things.

Both requirements apply: **mean height increase at least 8 mm over eight days AND at least 5 of the original six alive at Day 8**. Do not combine A's measure with B's measure to invent an option. If neither meets both, say neither and ask for a reviewed next check.

| Earlier first cohort, Day 8 | Starting mean (mm) | Final mean (mm) | Alive at check | Original sample |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| A | 12 | 20 | 6 | 6 |
| B | 12 | 25 | 5 | 6 |

Earlier first reader: display coordinator; If more than one option qualifies, prioritise greater recorded mean height increase.

| Different new cohort, its own Day 8 | Starting mean (mm) | Final mean (mm) | Alive at check | Original sample |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| A | 12 | 22 | 5 | 6 |
| B | 12 | 23 | 4 | 6 |

**Later reader:** the fictional review coordinator, using the same two minimum requirements. If more than one option qualifies, prioritise greater recorded mean height increase. This is a new reader and new supplied record, not an actual consulted person or proven treatment effect. There is still no record after each cohort's eight-day period.

## Your later job

1. Calculate the new cohort's two height increases and state alive counts, units, original sample and its own eight-day period.
2. Apply both minimum requirements and the later reader's priority to the new cohort. Make a new two-requirement table and decide, with two exact details.
3. Refer to your preserved first decision. Keep or revise it for the later source/reader and explain the specific change or continuing support. Distinguish a new cohort from a longer record of the first cohort.
4. Write a short useful next-step note for this later reader: decision, growth-versus-survival reason, one uncertainty and a feasible evidence question/plan for adult review. Do not imply actual impact, consent or investigation from this supplied answer.

## Your own later blank

```text
NEW COHORT / ORIGINAL SAMPLE / ITS EIGHT-DAY PERIOD: _______
NEW A INCREASE / WORKING / ALIVE COUNT: ____________________
NEW B INCREASE / WORKING / ALIVE COUNT: ____________________
NEW A REQUIREMENT 1 / REQUIREMENT 2: _______________________
NEW B REQUIREMENT 1 / REQUIREMENT 2: _______________________
LATER READER / PRIORITY / DECISION / TWO DETAILS: __________
FIRST DECISION / KEEP OR REVISE / REASON: __________________
WHY THESE ARE NOT ONE SIXTEEN-DAY COHORT: __________________
MY USEFUL LATER NOTE / LIMIT / NEXT ENQUIRY: _______________
```

Full text/table is the literal alternative. Original source/task © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0; future delivery needs complete portable notices. Educator keys remain separate.