# Desk run-through · teacher, learner, reviewer

**Status:** Author desk simulation on 29 September 2026. This is not a classroom pilot, accessibility user study, state approval or measured improvement in learning. The [repeatable verifier](verify_pack.py) checks counts, official rows, arithmetic invariants, PDF properties, links and hashes; a person must still inspect the actual reading and teaching. No real child data was used.

| Lens | Run performed | Finding and next action |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Teacher planning tomorrow | Followed [Day 11](LESSONS.md#week-3-day-11-agreement-is-not-identification) from original log to exit and private next move; tried [Day 14](LESSONS.md#week-3-day-14-one-sentence-three-jobs) with a deliberately hanging *because* clause; answered held-out [Check A](ASSESSMENT.md#check-a-day-15-fresh-model-source) independently before looking at the [key](TEACHER-KEY.md#check-a-day-15-worked-key-and-next-moves). Checked all ten six-step totals and the three routes/day. | The sequence continues the first fortnight but tests **scope/label** rather than the earlier unclear first question. A teacher can run one 25-minute block using selectable text and a blank aid. A real class may need more time for discussion, reader testing or accessible format preparation; extend locally rather than rush the construct. |
| Learner needing a flexible route | Read [Text D](TEXTS.md#text-d-the-same-marks-can-name-different-quantities-original-explainer) with the [linear number map](print/TEXT-ALTERNATIVES.md#number-and-meaning-map); used Day 16's caption repair and Day 17's scene-map choices; rehearsed Day 19's two reader questions with a paper draft. Checked that both quiet speech/AAC and written choices demand the same source-bound explanation. | The text can be analysed without colour, handwriting speed, device access or public performance. Adult reading can give access but must be recorded as listening-supported comprehension. Local screen-reader, Braille, AAC and translation review remain open. |
| Time-poor family | Used an optional paper-card Day 11 route and Day 18 named-whole question without a device, account, household finance, travel or interview. | The home route is **optional** and works with scrap paper or a spoken answer. No parent is asked to assess a held-out check, buy an aid or disclose personal data. |
| Funder/curriculum reviewer | Compared all selected Year 7 English codes, source rows and descriptions against the pinned ACARA workbook, audited the original/ACARA/font rights split, checked the two check passages stay out of teaching, and inspected three SVG/PDF/text aid pairs. Regenerated the pairs and compared bytes. Worked the arithmetic and the sample answers in the separate key. | The evidence supports a reviewable authored fortnight with exact partial alignment; it does **not** prove complete Year 7 English, broader literary diversity, local compliance, assistive-technology success or student outcomes. Seek educator, maths specialist and learner review before stronger claims. |

**Specific corrections made in desk review:** The initial Day 20 key expressed a percent conversion as multiplication by `100%`, which is not the intended mathematical statement. It now says `0.4 = 40/100 = 40%`. Text D keeps `3:4` outside the equality `3/4 = 0.75 = 75%`; the ratio needs context. Check A separates a route's repeated output from the new symbol's identity. Check B ties 40% to a named 40-cell whole. The literature note explicitly states that these original texts do not fulfil the wider First Nations Australian and diverse Australian/world author selection requirement.

**Field pass still needed:** Ask a Year 7 English teacher to time Days 11, 17 and 20; a mathematics specialist to review the number explanation; willing learners using their own access supports to try the text and aids; and a jurisdictional curriculum lead to select complementary literary works. Record feedback without names in public files and revise this dated pack. A desk check cannot substitute for that use.

**Original resource rights:** © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, SubjectNest, [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Credit, source, licence and changes.