SubjectNest · play with a familiar adult

Make it work for your family or groupEarly years home play · W3–4 · Source56 / Edit

Source review complete · local suitability still needs review.

You can change the original invitations and artwork with credit under CC BY 4.0. Use the editable card Markdown or play-path.json. Keep each card's purpose, a short opening, an actual fresh start, practical routes, adult-help distinctions and rest/finish choices. Replace examples with your own supported context; label invented examples as fiction.

A short proposal is enough

Copy the card into your own file. Tell us which invitation and edition you changed, paste the proposed words, say why they help, and include primary sources for any factual change. Add the reuse credit and a short changes note. The blank local-source form helps with dated information. Leave child names, diagnoses, identifiable work, contact details and private conversations out of public proposals.

Keep the complete proposal in your own file. When you want to offer it for review, open Contribute to SubjectNest or the prefilled suggestion form. Short suggestions fit the online form: it needs your adult reply email, a topic, consent and its spam check, with a message limit of 2,000 characters. For longer editable attachments, use hello@neuroforge.io. Include the resource link/version, proposed change, reason, relevant source and ownership or sharing rights. Keep examples fictional or general.

Routes checked 8 October 2026. Saving, copying or exporting a draft is not submission. A proposal enters review; it does not publish automatically, transfer rights or grant a licence. Recheck the live route when using an older downloaded copy.

Example credit: Tiny places, thoughtful welcomes © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Adapted by your chosen credit name; changes: simplified invitation 13 and added a dated local reference.

Software files carry Apache License 2.0; keep their full grant and notices. Outside framework/council material has separate rights. Source reviewers assess changed facts, meaning, consent, practicality, access, blank/model distinctions and credit. A user's helpful edit does not become an approved curriculum mapping automatically.

The included source creator supports complete reproduction from the editable seed. Its read-only default compares the current generated edition. Explicit output makes a new directory; it refuses existing or unsafe targets before writing. Editing an owned seed is a changed edition that needs fresh generation and review. A source verifier pass does not replace that review or a human trial.