These are fictional plans or diagrams, not classroom trials or known material behaviour. Each is a fresh example to adapt after the daily lesson, never a replacement for the held assessment. If an approved real object is later tried, record actual local date/conditions/result separately. Children may answer through speech, point, sign, AAC, adult scribe or broad fixed tactile shapes. Do not force an object or require family equipment.
Day 51
- Library return tray drawing: A page shows an arrow toward a drawn tray opening. Worked report: “The arrow points toward the opening; no book was moved here. I could ask whether a broad card can pass safely.”
- Garden label sketch: Two lines surround an outline of a large plant label. Worked report: “I can see the outline between lines in a sketch; that does not prove a real label moved.”
Day 52
- Art-folder plan: A broad folder outline has its short side toward a 10 cm paper gap. Worked report: “My model prediction is that the short side may fit; I would record a separate before prediction for an actual approved folder.”
- Toy-road drawing: A 7 cm wide block outline faces an 11 cm marked road. Worked report: “The drawn widths suggest room; an actual result is NOT TESTED.”
Day 53
- Music-card plan: A paper card outline is drawn inside a corridor. Worked report: “The diagram shows inside; it does not show an actual slow slide, so I record NOT TESTED.”
- Postcard staging: An adult-approved large real card could be slid once between fixed strips. Worked report: “Record the actual date, measured width, gentle action and INSIDE/TOUCHED/STOPPED only after it truly happens.”
Day 54
- Map-folder sketch: One large folder outline appears lengthwise then crosswise in the same drawn passage. Worked report: “Orientation changed; folder size and material did not change in the plan.”
- Stage-sign plan: Same broad sign outline is turned while drawn lines stay fixed. Worked report: “Compare the two drawings as drawings; actual passage needs two safe dated tries.”
Day 55
- Lunch-mat sketch: A broad rectangle is drawn in two orientations beside a marked gap. Worked report: “I can ask which orientation might pass; this new drawing is NOT TESTED.”
- Parcel-card plan: A large card outline appears beside two straight lines. Worked report: “Before a real try I would predict, then adult check slow and flat with no force.”
Day 56
- Exhibition-label plan: Two same-material-labelled large rectangles are 7 cm and 11 cm across an 8 cm drawn gap. Worked report: “The smaller outline fits between drawn lines; no real labels were measured or moved.”
- Seed-tray sign plan: Large signs differ in width and thickness. Worked report: “I cannot claim width alone from a future difference unless I record and consider thickness/material/action.”
Day 57
- Picnic-shape drawing: A 6 cm circle and 9 cm square face an 8 cm gap. Worked report: “Both shape and width differ; this cannot isolate shape.”
- Museum-tag plan: A 7 cm square and 7 cm diameter circle have the same marked maximum width. Worked report: “The drawing holds maximum width more closely; real material and movement still need verification.”
Day 58
- Book-display plan: One 11 cm broad outline faces drawn 10 cm and 15 cm passages. Worked report: “The gap changed in the diagram; no book actually moved.”
- Building-block mat: A large safe approved block could be moved on a tabletop after adult marks two widths. Worked report: “Same block/orientation/surface/action; record both real gap widths and distinct outcomes, or NOT TESTED.”
Day 59
- Festival-banner plan: The speaker says “Every banner passes.” Worked report: “My drawing only shows one outline and one gap; I cannot say every banner passes.”
- Transport-map sketch: A route line crosses a drawn opening. Worked report: “The map has a line through the opening; no object moved. I need an actual dated safe source to make a movement claim.”
Day 60
- Classroom-display card: One broad card outline sits by two invented widths. Worked report: “I can say which paper gap is wider and ask what one actual approved card would do; paper alone is not a result.”
- Outdoor-activity map: A drawn route is wide in one place and narrow in another. Worked report: “This is a map comparison, not a test of a real object; do not use a person's route or mobility as the tested prop.”