Use one choice when it suits the child. These are complete invented examples with worked answers for teaching. They are not actual household observations and do not introduce new claims about all materials. Keep real sensory access and interpretation of a report distinct. The teacher can change the playful context without changing the property question. No child needs a pet, device, favourite show, possessions or a particular family experience.
Day 151
- Moon-mail booth. An invented booth model has a paperboard surround and a clear plastic panel, identified by its maker's material note. The helper reports seeing a large moon through the panel. Worked report: “The booth is the object. The surround and panel are parts. Their material names come from the maker's note; the see-moon result comes from the helper's view.”
- Picture-ticket stand. An invented stand has a card base and a plastic sheet. The child is given no brand or plastic-type information. Worked report: “I can name the parts and the reported materials. I cannot identify a polymer from this picture.”
Day 152
- Rocket puppet hatch. Before the row is revealed, an invented observer predicts “I will see the rocket star through the hatch.” The supplied row says “I could see its star's edge through the panel.” Worked report: “The recorded view matches the prior see-star prediction. This is a record comparison, not my own rocket experiment.”
- Hide-and-seek cover. An invented observer predicts no view through a broad cover. The revealed row says “I could see a fuzzy square.” Worked report: “The prediction and view differed. A fuzzy square was visible in this record, even though its edge was not clear.”
Day 153
- Mini theatre. In a supplied model, one white sheet gives a fuzzy face view; card gives no face view; a clear panel gives an edge view. Worked report: “The three recorded views differ. Card suits the model's hiding job; the clear panel suits its see-edge job.”
- Library picture pocket. A fictional pocket panel shows a broad blue circle in one recorded view. The cardboard back does not. Worked report: “The panel and back have different recorded see-circle properties. The source does not tell us which resists tearing.”
Day 154
- Soft moon scene. One supplied paper sheet shows a pale moon shape; two comparable sheets in the model obscure it. The prior prediction was “The second sheet will make the moon harder to see.” Worked report: “That predicted change matches these invented rows. It does not prove every two-sheet paper combination hides a moon.”
- Garden puppet screen. A different supplied record says a large leaf picture's outline remains visible through both one and two sheets. The prior prediction was “I won't see it through two.” Worked report: “This record differs from that prediction. Keep the actual recorded result instead of changing it to the moon example's result.”
Day 155 · Teaching after the fresh response only
- Puzzle-cover comparison. An invented observer predicts seeing a puzzle picture through two panels. Row A says picture edge visible; row B says no picture visible. Worked report: “A matches the prediction; B differs. Neither row tells us scratch resistance.”
- Paper bus window. A model row says a large passenger silhouette is visible through a panel. No roof check is supplied. Worked report: “The row can help a see-silhouette choice. It cannot prove the panel can carry a load.”
Day 156
- Toy museum door. A fictional helper wants visitors to see a broad paper fossil drawing through a model panel. The record reports its outline visible. Worked report: “This view helps the see-drawing question. Whether the panel is safe outdoors is a different question not answered here.”
- Cafe picture board. An invented helper wants a panel that shows a large cup picture. Their question is “Can I see the picture from the marked place?” Worked report: “That question can be answered by a relevant recorded view. The picture's appearance says nothing about food hygiene or hot-liquid use.”
Day 157
- Resting puppet room. A child in an invented story chooses a broad opaque cover to hide a puppet's circle. The recorded view says no circle visible. Worked report: “The cover helps this model's hiding purpose. Hiding is a valid chosen use; clearer is not automatically better.”
- Paper fish display. A maker's note identifies a card border and clear plastic panel; the supplied view shows the fish picture's oval through the panel. Worked report: “One object has two reported materials. The panel's recorded see-oval property helps the show-picture job; this is not a real aquarium or water test.”
Day 158
- Postbox repeat. Two supplied views of the same model slot show the circle edge on both occasions; the prior repeat prediction was “I will see it again.” Worked report: “These two rows match the repeat prediction. We still have only those two supplied views.”
- Shadowy desk. A supplied model's later row says unclear, and its note records that the view position changed. Worked report: “The rows differ. The position change is a recorded setup difference; it is a possible question to check, not proved cause.”
Day 159
- Sports mascot booth. A fictional helper note says “In this notebook, the broad ball picture's edge was visible through panel T.” A supplied listener example says “I know which panel the note means.” Worked report: “The sample label makes the model note useful. That listener line is an example, not actual feedback from a person.”
- Train picture gallery. An invented note first says “This is best.” Its revision says “In this model, I could see the train's square through panel T, from the marked place.” Worked report: “The revision names source, sample, target and property. It does not claim best for every purpose.”
Day 160 · Teaching after the fresh response only
- Board-game viewer. The supplied object has a paperboard rim and a plastic panel. A record says a broad checker square is visible through the panel; no bending is described. Worked report: “The panel's reported view helps the see-square purpose. We need different evidence before describing bend behaviour.”
- Puppet parcel shield. A fictional object has a card support and a clear panel. An invented helper asks whether it keeps paper dry. Only a see-circle row exists. Worked report: “The source does not answer the dry-paper job. Ask an approved adult what safe evidence would be needed; don't assume see-through means waterproof.”