Teacher desk walkthrough
The adult reads MATERIALS first, prepares broad safe sample pieces and one puppet target, then follows the six timed steps for each day. Two early tasks are genuinely different: identifying an object's parts/material sources and making a prior see-through prediction. Later tasks compare samples, change layers, select a purposeful puppet window and leave a useful helper note. The scripts offer the full actual route and a complete fictional alternative. No parent purchase, camera, learner account or public display is needed.
The educator keeps actual/material/source IDs, exact prior words and raw results. The supplied P/C/T/PP observations must never replace actual rows. One-/two-sheet outcomes are not guaranteed. Part/source/property evidence is distinct from craft completion. Each fresh paper check has a separate key, neutral communication options and flexible time.
Child desk walkthrough
Pip has a big-circle body, a friendly face and a simple practical job. A child chooses peek or hide, sample order, question and note form. Adults do the assembly and follow the child's choices. A quiet private explanation is enough. Seeing, touching, handling, sharing and a device are optional. Tactile access can support a tactile property; it cannot manufacture a visual transparency observation. “Unclear”, changing a prediction and declining a sensory task are allowed.
Parent desk walkthrough
The optional two-minute choices work with the supplied model and conversation. No one needs special supplies or home evidence. Family rows are practice, not grading. A parent can simply enjoy the puppet choice; terminology teaching and uploads are not expected.
Assessor / potential funder desk walkthrough
Seven exact Foundation descriptions are pinned and matched against the original workbook and local import. The crosswalk states precisely which task/evidence could support which description. Model/actual/report access is separate. Checks sample bounded interpretation, not mastery. All lesson/example/artwork content is original with attribution/licence; official wording and font terms remain separate. This demonstrates inspectable resource production and technical checks, not adoption, effectiveness, state approval or successful classroom delivery.
Executed review log
Executed 30 September 2026 before freeze:
- Author read the selected rows directly from the pinned original ACARA XLSX and compared them with the import/crosswalk. A separate agent independently matched the seven rows and official indexed QCAA Prep alignment. The source hash is stated in the crosswalk; direct QCAA PDF retrieval limits remain visible.
- Author rendered and visually inspected all six actual PDFs together. Independent review inspected all six actual pages separately. Text, exact alternatives, A4 geometry and safe text bounds passed. The generator reproduced all twelve assets plus the exact text companion byte for byte in a temporary folder.
- Independent browser review ran all four covers × two views at 1280/390/320px: 24 states, correct rows/picture visibility/pressed state, keyboard, reset/reload, full no-JavaScript table, no page overflow or script errors, and no external requests or storage/network/media APIs.
- Author used the corrected lab at 390px through its real cover selector, Words control and Reset. T showed the exact clear-panel record, Words hid the picture, Reset restored P/Pictures. Actual client width and scroll width both measured 375px. The corrected fuzzy picture was inspected on screen; no script errors were recorded.
- Independent critique found clipped native cover labels at 320px, a crisp circle drawing labelled fuzzy, and a daily baseline phrase that could permit an unsupported cover/hiding inference. Author shortened the option labels, softened the original circle using a radial gradient in print and screen, and required an available uncovered baseline in materials and Days 152/153/158. The reviewer rechecked all three fixes and inspected the corrected actual layer-pair PDF and 320px picture.
- Fresh AH/AI source answers, lack of teaching leakage, exact part/material/report distinctions, practical choice, optional family burden, nonvisual access and rights were independently reviewed. The normal verifier checks timings, route/example/home counts, exact sources, print reproduction, JavaScript syntax, local links and complete file hashes. Normal checks are read-only; manifest writing requires the explicit author flag.
These are author and independent agent desk/technical checks. No person acted as a trial learner, educator, parent or funder; no actual material experiment or learning gain was collected. The isolated browser tab and preview server are closed after review.
Human use still needed
Current school/local syllabus check, educator practical trial of the selected materials, individual accessibility review and a willing child/parent classroom/home pilot remain open. Any optional actual listener response must be recorded as actually heard, or NONE. No participant is invented.
Original SubjectNest review notes © 2026 NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd, CC BY 4.0.