# NEXT03 · A whole is not each

<p>Year 1 Maths · resources 15–16 · Days 71–80 · 13 October 2026 Source edition.</p>
<h2>Component and target criterion</h2><p>A-first-Q3 · Rejects ten game cards for each player because that would give the whole ten to one player or need twenty cards for both. Names five cards each and checks the actual ten-card collection.</p><h2>Purpose</h2><p>Teach this particular missing component with a new ordinary job after retaining the held first response. The previous answer/source is not silently edited into a new independent sample.</p><h2>Entry</h2><p>Read the exact original response and separate access support from mathematical hints. Check counting the fresh whole and understanding the named unit. Offer a small new four-member/two-place or six-member/two-per-pack introduction if this representation is new; do not require fluent symbolic division.</p><h2>Materials</h2><p>Plain paper, a pencil or child-directed marks, safe large pieces and named places. A place can be a drawn box or spoken label. No food, real money, purchase, printer, account or device required. A helper moves only the piece/place the child chooses.</p><h2>Time</h2><p>About 8–12 minutes, unpiloted; split or stop as needed.</p><div class="source"><h3>NEXT03</h3><p>A new pretend collection has 8 whole fabric-picture cards. Share equally between 2 named places, as many whole members per place as possible, leaving leftovers aside. How many go to each place and how many remain?</p></div><h2>Five full teaching moves</h2><p>1. Introduce the entire new source and ask what each quantity names. Preserve a first model or explanation. 2. Introduce a pretend claim that each place gets all 8. Build that proposed allocation using only the actual 8 and show the second recipient is omitted. Reset the collection, allocate equally and label four-per-place versus eight-in all. 3. Teach with the separate worked possibility below only after that first attempt. Invite the child to direct a different coherent model; do not require a faster strategy or a repeated physical action. 4. Introduce the full different guided source, not just new numerals. Let the child first choose a representation and label the requested quantity. 5. Recheck the precise new-source component, record actual support and choose another fresh opportunity later if needed.</p><h2>New-source adult model</h2><p>Name 8 as the whole collection and 2 as the known number of recipients. Deal one fabric-picture card to each recipient in a complete round, or make a different equal-allocation model the child can explain. After 4 complete rounds each recipient has 4 fabric-picture cards; 0 whole fabric-picture cards remain aside. Check every recipient has the same amount and that every member of the original collection is in exactly one recipient place or the leftover place. The collection check is 4 + 4=8. The requested answer names an amount per recipient, not the total or number of recipients. Do not split a whole card or invent more members; another fairness arrangement would need a different agreed job.</p><h2>Full different guided practice</h2><div class="source"><h3>A whole different guided try</h3><p>In a separately introduced new job, 10 whole pattern cards are shared equally between 2 places, as many whole members per place as possible, with leftovers aside. How many go to each and how many stay aside? A pretend helper says each place gets all ten cards. Does that fit this whole job? Explain using the stated collection and rule.</p></div><h2>Guided worked possibility</h2><p>Name 10 as the whole collection and 2 as the known number of recipients. Deal one pattern card to each recipient in a complete round, or make a different equal-allocation model the child can explain. After 5 complete rounds each recipient has 5 pattern cards; 0 whole pattern cards remain aside. Check every recipient has the same amount and that every member of the original collection is in exactly one recipient place or the leftover place. The collection check is 5 + 5=10. The requested answer names an amount per recipient, not the total or number of recipients. Do not split a whole card or invent more members; another fairness arrangement would need a different agreed job. The supplied claim does not fit: check the complete represented collection and the exact required relationship rather than the confidence of the claim.</p><h2>Observation</h2><p>Read the full guided source and its stated helper claim. Invite the child to decide whether it fits and explain with a model, words or directed objects. Keep both first response and any subsequent support. Challenge a whole-as-each claim.</p><h2>Guided source criterion</h2><p>Explains why the specific helper claim in this new guided source fails the stated relationship, using the actual whole, requested unit and equality/complete-size/equal-kit rule. An unexplained rejection or correct numeral alone is insufficient. Keep this guided source distinct from the old held case.</p><h2>Follow-up and eligibility</h2><p>A later new small source may change the named purpose or one stated quantity. Introduce it whole, check its intended relationship and criterion before use, and keep it as a separate dated record. A prompted correction now is supported teaching, not proof of unseen transfer.</p><h2>Access choices</h2><p>Let the child mix objects, a drawing, speech, signing, AAC, tactile marks or an exact directed helper. Read the whole source and allow processing time. Offer a quiet seated route and a pause. Record reading/motor access separately from hints that choose a mathematical step. These are choices, not fixed learning styles or neurotype assignments.</p>
<p>Original SubjectNest resource © Neuro Forge IO Pty Ltd 2026 · CC BY 4.0. Adapted Source edition, 13 October 2026. Provider curriculum and cultural permissions remain separate.</p><p><a href="../../teacher/rights.html">Complete rights, curriculum notices and licences</a></p>
