Ten 12-minute blocks mix health/inclusion reasoning with opt-in movement strategy. No diagnosis, treatment, disclosure of identity or relationship experience, forced movement, competition score, public recording or exercise prescription is requested. Follow school policy and learner access needs. A plan is valuable evidence of planning, but is not evidence of movement performance, participation or demonstrated fair play. Only mark actual enactment when safely observed with willing people. Use the clean learner cards. Every block runs 0–2 orient; 2–4 model; 4–10 A/B/C; 10–12 collect/next. The two fresh HPE checks are additional publicly accessible formative prompts, not secure exams.
HPE Day 11 · Library-club invitation · AC9HP10P05
0–2: Read the fictional exclusionary poster without referring to classmates. 2–4: Model an invitation with equally valued speaking, writing/AAC and organising roles. 4–10: A/B/C designs a change and feedback question. 10–12 evidence/next: A useful strategy changes the club's process, not just “be nice”; a person may choose or decline. If one role is treated as lesser, ask who gets meaningful influence. Home: optional fictional poster rewrite with no interview.
HPE Day 12 · Sleep-product claim audit · AC9HP10P09
0–2: Label the ad invented and the topic not personal medical advice. 2–4: Highlight the universal “guarantees perfect” language. 4–10: A/B/C asks about evidence population, outcome, harms and source. 10–12 evidence/next: No study, population or safety information is supplied, so the guarantee is unsupported. If a learner gives a personal recommendation, return to source critique and locally qualified support pathways. Home: critique a fictional health line only; do not search or share personal health information.
HPE Day 13 · Timetable transition · AC9HP10P02
0–2: State the fictional room change; no reason for a communication need must be disclosed. 2–4: Model both a concise message and a way to confirm receipt. 4–10: A/B/C refines an accessible transition. 10–12 evidence/next: A robust plan includes time, location, alternative format and a private route for questions. If the learner relies only on a shouted announcement, ask how someone who missed it would know. Home: a paper message only, no actual contact.
HPE Day 14 · Shared-material permission · AC9HP10P04
0–2: The peer and tools are invented. 2–4: Model “May I use this?” and accepting “no”; discuss how a facilitator's authority could help or pressure. 4–10: A/B/C creates a respectful dialogue/process. 10–12 evidence/next: Respect means the request is optional, the refusal works and shared alternatives are available; power is relevant if a leader overrides the boundary. If learner treats “please ask first” as hostility, reframe it as a clear choice. Home: no live role-play required.
HPE Day 15 · Crowded-room safety plan · AC9HP10P08
0–2: This is a no-injury paper scenario, not an emergency drill. 2–4: Model pause → tell responsible adult → follow approved route, with no self-clearing task. 4–10: A/B/C plans/rehearses the decision on cards. 10–12 evidence/next: Evaluate whether the plan avoids the blocked aisle and follows local staff direction. If a learner runs through or moves boxes in the scenario, ask what school policy and responsible adult would require. Home: paper-only safety message; no hazard inspection.
HPE Day 16 · Tabletop passing strategy · AC9HP10M02
0–2: Ask consent for any paper-token run; paper simulation is also valid planning. 2–4: Model one turn rule and a meaningful-turn count. 4–10: A/B/C creates and refines a strategy through safe run, directed run or explicitly untested simulation. 10–12 evidence/next: Note actual turn evidence only if a run occurred; compare before/after rule and a participant choice. If no run happened, log strategy design only. Home: write a hypothetical rotation without needing a partner.
HPE Day 17 · Seated rhythm route · AC9HP10M02
0–2: Movement and hearing routes are optional; follow school safety/access guidance. 2–4: Model four boxes TOUCH/REST/TOUCH/REST and a visual cue. 4–10: A/B/C creates a coordinated strategy, possibly testing comfortable motion. 10–12 evidence/next: A successful strategy names timing, cue and how willing partners can opt in or change it; only actual runs evidence observed coordination. If sound is the only cue, ask for a non-audio option. Home: four-box silent score, no exercise requirement.
HPE Day 18 · Fair-play passing game · AC9HP10M08
0–2: State the fictional unfair turn rule and get consent for any opt-in movement; offer comfortable seated pass, roll or directed-move options under school guidance. 2–4: Model a fair procedure agreed before play. 4–10: A/B/C runs/observes/reviews the small physical passing challenge or writes an untested plan. 10–12 evidence/next: Demonstrated fair play requires a real willing run and reflection on the physical activity outcome; a paper critique is useful but remains planning. If a learner imposes a rule without agreement, ask how players can contest it. Home: design a hypothetical fair turn sequence.
HPE Day 19 · Reach-route adaptation · AC9HP10P05
0–2: No person's reach or ability is measured. 2–4: Model equal-goal station choices, not a “normal” route. 4–10: A/B/C proposes participation options and a feedback question. 10–12 evidence/next: The strategy preserves meaningful choice and a no-penalty decline; it does not certify access without users' input. If “everyone can reach” appears, ask what source supports it: none. Home: paper station plan only.
HPE Day 20 · Mixed-role activity review · AC9HP10M09
0–2: Roles are fictional; group enactment is opt-in and school-approved. 2–4: Model one turn of caller/mover/recorders and an agreed swap. 4–10: A/B/C devises and refines rotation by trial/directed observation or clearly untested plan. 10–12 evidence/next: Actual collaboration/leadership evidence depends on an observed willing-group round; otherwise record a designed strategy. If one participant controls all decisions, ask where others can influence the rule. Home: role cards with a fairness question, no group required.
Original resource rights: © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, SubjectNest, CC BY 4.0. Credit author, source, licence and changes. This is not medical or safety advice; local policy and qualified support take precedence.