These are original simulations of source types, not real documents, contracts, people or reviews. Their dates and names are invented. Use the cards to practise source questions; they give no authority for a purchase. No current market price, consumer-rights statement or accessibility certification appears here. Provide selectable text or print; do not ask learners to search their family contracts.
Card P · invented provider-style summary
Fictional StudyHire summary, dated 12 August 2026. “Plan A: $240 setup and $80 for each complete month. Plan B: $480 setup and $50 for each complete month. Both are described here as month-to-month with no exit charge. This summary does not include the full contract, repair schedule, device specification or tested accessibility features.”
What it can support: the invented price rules and what this particular summary claims about an exit charge. What it cannot verify: an actual provider's terms, equivalent service or real-world accessibility. It is a simulated provider voice with an interest in enrolment.
Card U · unattributed comment
Fictional anonymous comment, undated. “B always works out cheaper. I wouldn't bother reading the rest.” The writer gives no month count, payment record, method or identity.
What it can support: that someone in the fiction expresses a view. What it cannot support: a universal cost comparison; at four months the invented Plan A total is lower. No reader should treat this as a verified testimonial.
Card T · limited access tryout note
Fictional two-person tryout note, dated 13 August 2026. “Two adult volunteers used a sample device to type a short document. Both completed that task. The note does not say which plan supplied the device, whether assistive technology was tested, or what instructions and support were provided.”
What it can support: only that two fictional adults completed one described task. What it cannot support: a claim that either plan is accessible for every user or equivalent in service. A valid local access review would need suitable people, consent, methods and equipment for the actual context.
Teacher use
Ask: “Which card helps answer what are the stated fees?” P, with the classroom-fiction limit. “Which card establishes that B is always cheaper?” None; calculate at a named horizon. “Which card establishes equivalent access?” None. “What is a next source?” A real adult would need current full written terms and a suitable access/service check, assessed under local policy. Do not present these invented cards as independent verification. Record whether a learner distinguishes a source's content, origin, purpose and limit.
Reuse: Original SubjectNest fictional source cards © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0. Credit source/licence and mark changes.