The learner chooses or changes route without being assigned a fixed learning style or disability category. Every route requires the same evidence, unit and limit. “Move” means the learner can direct a partner to place full-word strips; “speak” includes sign or AAC. A reader or scribe gives access, while a prompt that supplies an economic inference is recorded as content support. Spoken economic reasoning does not prove independent reading ability.
| Day | Route A · annotate/write | Route B · full-word/movable | Route C · spoken/digital | Shared target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mark chooser, constraint and competing use in B and D; write two triples. | Sort full-word B/D strips under chooser/input/use/forgone. | Dictate two triples while looking at or hearing the same card facts. | Relative scarcity and choice without “nothing exists.” |
| 2 | Write B's decision and the 24-book forgone output with units. | Move “2 staff-hours”, “digital help” and “24 books catalogued” into a decision chain. | Explain the chain orally/AAC and state why it is not a $24 cost. | Next-best feasible alternative. |
| 3 | Make D's what/how/for-whom grid plus efficiency/equity note. | Place full-word D evidence beneath three question headings; leave missing facts blank. | Record a three-question decision memo and an unknown-access question. | Allocation questions and distribution limit. |
| 4 | Annotate C's four input examples and income-category pairs. | Place four full-word input strips on factors mat; add four income words in a second row. | Describe each match and say that the card does not report payment. | Factor classification, not invented earnings. |
| 5 | Write File G's five-part short response before feedback. | Arrange File G strips in a scarcity ledger and factors mat, then direct recorded answers. | Type, sign or dictate the same five parts from the fresh case. | Independent first-encounter transfer. |
| 6 | Plot A's five points and label axes, units and fixed inputs. | Put (0,12), (1,11), (2,9), (3,6), (4,0) strips in coordinate order. | Narrate five pairs and what “maximum” means; teacher marks your chosen positions. | Construct a bounded PPF. |
| 7 | Classify F1/F2/(2,6) on the plotted A frontier; calculate 2→3 cost. | Move full-word “on frontier”, “inside” and “beyond” labels to coordinate strips. | Explain placements and three-circle cost with units. | Feasibility, efficiency and movement trade-off. |
| 8 | Draw old (3,6) and proposed new (4,6) with a cautious note. | Put old/new point strips on two labelled mats and add “one point only” warning. | Explain what E proposes and what it cannot prove. | Possible workshop-side opportunity, not macro proof. |
| 9 | Write F1/F2 comparison under a declared criterion and equity question. | Move F1/F2 output strips under two alternative criterion cards; leave “preferred by whom?” open. | Record one conditional decision and an evidence request. | Efficient mix versus equitable distribution. |
| 10 | Graph/annotate File H and submit its new-case reasoning. | Order H's five frontier pairs and place X/Y/inside/beyond strips. | Explain cost, classification, conditional choice and unknown access. | Independent new frontier transfer. |
The four visual/full-text/tactile aids are colour-independent. Extend the seven-minute window if needed; the shared target remains the economic reasoning.
SubjectNest original access routes © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0.