Target: compare the public E, literary F and internal G without treating a fictional note as a real policy. Prepare: all three source labels and the source lens.
- Launch · 2 min. Show G's “We should revise it.” Ask which earlier words “it” refers to.
- Model · 4 min. Trace G back to E's headline and F's unresolved toy. Explain G's purpose: coordinate volunteers and avoid overreporting, not market the event.
- Guided reading · 5 min. Place three source cards in order
public invitation / one invented encounter / internal adjustment. Ask whether F proves that all visits fail. Ask whether G supplies access arrangements; it supplies an offered route, not full arrangements. - Practice route · 7 min. Learners choose Day 13 route; make a three-source comparison: one selected detail per source, one difference in audience/purpose, and a question not answered by any source.
- Peer audit · 4 min. Partner checks each attribution and labels any imported real-world rule as unsupported.
- Exit · 3 min. “Which source can tell us what the organisers planned to change?” Key: G, as a fictional internal note; it cannot certify that change happened.