Health opening fortnight… | Year 11 Health · T1 W1–2 · Run Through

This is a desk simulation and local artifact review, not a classroom trial, clinical review, accessibility certification, user study, funder endorsement or evidence that anyone's wellbeing changed. Each role tried to use the pack and tested a concrete overclaim.

Role and attempted use	Fault sought	Correction or release boundary
Teacher preparing Day 1 quickly	Would the smiling poster invite a class-wide self-rating or a healthy/unhealthy label?	The script keeps evidence in a fictional third-person case, and the key says no diagnosis or health status follows. A learner can choose a parallel fictional context without explaining why.
Teacher checking Day 2	Could a strengths lens erase a real barrier or turn resilience into a virtue score?	The two-lens task keeps risk and resources in view. The source gives a possible noisy entry, optional buddy and quiet area; neither lens diagnoses the newcomer.
Teacher reviewing Day 4	Could an online-only form be described as a legal breach or proof of individual exclusion?	The resource-access mat uses “possible barrier”, marks actual uptake unknown, and asks what access evidence is needed. No policy rule is invented.
Learner switching A/B/C	Can a tactile or spoken route meet the same evidence target as a written audit?	The learner instructions require exact source detail, explanation and bounded revision on all routes. Five full text/tactile aids preserve the words. Equivalent learning outcomes have not been tested.
Parent or supporter at home	Do tasks demand personal stories, a mental-health survey, purchase or online service account?	Twenty optional contexts are invented, paper-only and no-purchase. The supporter may move labelled cards at the learner's direction and ask about the fictional source, without collecting real personal information.
Assessor viewing Check A/B	Can published checks be used as secure examinations or health screens?	Both checks and key say publicly accessible, not secure exams. The worked answers show denominator and unknown-outcome limits. A new local case is needed if prior access matters.
Accessibility reviewer	Does A4 contrast and a tactile description guarantee universal access?	Five PDFs were rendered and visually inspected; SVG title/description, PDF searchable text and full text/tactile routes exist. A school still needs learner-specific testing, Braille production and access arrangements.
Potential funder	Could ten lessons be presented as the full Health unit or a measured resilience intervention?	The crosswalk identifies only selected Stage 1 opportunities from printed pp. 14–16, 250 minutes against a 55-hour unit, with Stage 2/3 and real inquiry left to school-led work. No outcome claim is made.

Local review receipts

Official source: On 29 September 2026, the QCAA Health subject page and January 2026 Health 2025 v1.3 PDF were checked. Unit 1 starts printed p. 12; Stage 1 starts p. 14 and Stage 2 p. 17. The pack does not invent a Unit 1 “Topic 1”. The PDF is linked, not redistributed or falsely source-hashed.
Numbers and source boundaries: The verifier recomputes the fictional 8/12, 4/12, 3/4 and 5/10 checks, checks the stated population and outcome limits, and verifies distinct case names and public answer locations.
Print/navigation: Five A4 PDF/SVG pairs were regenerated deterministically, rendered and visually inspected for clipping; searchable text, font and full text/tactile alternatives were checked. Local links, source anchors, rights notices and every authored-file SHA are checked after the final edit.