This is the complete accepted proposal account retained for source meaning and limits. Source pages and seven-field controls are now authored locally; classroom, native print, assistive technology, listening and translation remain unverified. National reissue download was not reacquired; retained extract only. Council candidate is adult-only with dated direct-access failure. Child book-finding sources are complete original fiction.
A useful local question — adult fact review
Candidate narrow fact: Rockhampton Regional Council's primary Libraries page is indexed as offering an online catalogue to search books and online resources. Council Libraries, primary indexed text personally read12October2026; direct full open again returned403. This is a dated primary-indexed purpose statement, not a full live-service verification. Root's earlier full-open failure remains unchanged. Do not publish it as a verified current service guide until release review confirms the primary source. No account/search, availability, hours, membership, borrowing limits, fees or operational click sequence was used or inferred.
Useful teacher question: What might a catalogue help someone find? Compare the complete invented mini-book/story sources. A child can make a paper mini-catalogue and describe its purpose without any real search/account/device/outing. The invented page labels/contents are not Council's interface or a claim about the children's school library.
Nine empty adult local-review fields
- Provider/title.
- Primary URL.
- Exact section/locator.
- Publication/update date, or explicitly not supplied.
- Actual check date.
- Place/community covered.
- Narrow claim and what it does not establish.
- Rights/what expression or media is imported.
- Recheck need/decision and reviewer.
All start empty in the future paper/tool card. A teacher reads the actual local primary source, records a short factual paraphrase and scope, and selects only a useful meaning example. Absent dates stay absent. If the source cannot be checked, use a question or the complete original fictional example. Fees/hours/interface/account rules/item availability need fresh checks before use. Child-facing text shows just the useful reviewed fact, source label and question. Do not collect private search history, credentials, exact family addresses or child identifiers.
Council's page expression/logos/photos/catalogue data/programmes/account systems remain provider material; our narrow fact paraphrase imports none of those assets or permissions. Actual library literature still needs its own authority/licence; a catalogue purpose statement grants no book reproduction or FirstNations cultural rights.
Easy suggestions and educator corrections
Future editable MD/SVG/JSON should have an obvious adult Edit or suggest a change route. A manual submission asks for resource ID/version, exact current passage, proposed replacement, why it helps, primary source/date/locator, actual author/licence/consent for any contributed work and intended audience/access need. Give a plain copyable suggestion before any optional review submission. Keep child/personal information out. Show submission as a proposal waiting for human/editor review; do not overwrite accepted source automatically. This proposal supplies the workflow language, not a working submission service. Translation/FirstNations language review needs a suitably fluent and appropriately authorised reviewer; do not invent equivalents.
Original adult workflow words ©NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd2026, SubjectNest, CC BY4.0; provider facts/knowledge/contributions retain their own permissions.