V17 · Pop-up bakery prop comparison · own blank matYear 2 Science · T1 W9–10 · Assets / V17

Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Complete text alternative

Title: Pop-up bakery prop comparison · own blank mat. Case A-later. Complete neutral source:
Original fictional pop-up bakery scene. Job: a longer cue before the pretend tray changes. Same empty bowl/helper/observer spot are stated for both trials. Trial1 gentle tap once, report “short low tap”. Trial2 gentle rub once, report “longer scratchy sound”. Force was not measured. Before trials the helper predicted reports would be the same. No cue was tried with the bakery scene readers.

Exact own prompts and empty response spaces:
1. Name both actions and one supplied report difference.
[Own response space genuinely empty.]
2. Compare the supplied results with the before-trial prediction.
[Own response space genuinely empty.]
3. For the longer-cue job, what could you choose using a clue, and what remains untried?
[Own response space genuinely empty.]
4. With guidance, suggest one similarity for a new action comparison and a further question.
[Own response space genuinely empty.]
Role is neutral held source. No criterion, staff possible response or next-teaching account appears. Child can draw, sign, point, speak, AAC or dictate exact words; teacher records support and eligibility. No actual result is invented.

Actual original plane and relationships:
Own response1 empty — genuinely empty own region
Own response2 empty — genuinely empty own region
Own response3 empty — genuinely empty own region
Own response4 empty — genuinely empty own region

ALL actual visible text in reading order:
V17 · Pop-up bakery prop comparison · own blank mat
Own blank paper mat · A-later
Complete source — fictional records; any general reference stays attributed
Original fictional pop-up bakery scene. Job: a longer cue before the pretend tray changes. Same empty bowl/helper/observer spot are stated for both trials. Trial1 gentle tap once, report “short low tap”. Trial2 gentle rub once, report “longer scratchy sound”. Force was not measured. Before trials the helper predicted reports would be the same. No cue was tried with the bakery scene readers.
1. Name both actions and one supplied report difference.
2. Compare the supplied results with the before-trial prediction.
3. For the longer-cue job, what could you choose using a clue, and what remains untried?
4. With guidance, suggest one similarity for a new action comparison and a further question.
Same complete source and prompts for drawing / words / speech / sign / AAC / exact scribing.
Four own response areas stay genuinely empty; prompts/source only, no staff keys.
Original NeuroForge/SubjectNest2026 · CC BY4.0 · Full text alternative supplied.
Canvas840×1973; complete source text wrapped at24px; taller whole aid may span multiple print sheets without truncation. All figures/model words remain supplied, not own evidence.