Editable original text/data remain downloadable in the eventual source bank. A proposed contribution preserves the first version, names original file/source/date, states exact replacement and reason, links updated primary information, preserves credits and marks new claims. No child personal data. A teacher can review the whole source-task-criterion-example-alt together and submit through the site’s genuine approved contribution channel when available; this proposal adds no invented submission receipt or automated publication.
Downloadable editable material is in source/accepted and the complete shipped literal archive. A source change needs coupled source/task/criterion/model/visual-alt review. No child personal data or automatic publishing. No submitted or published contribution receipt is invented.
About this resourceReviewed source edition
Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.
Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.
Source: https://neuroforge.io/subjectnest/library/resources/year-3/english/term-1/weeks-07-08/edit-workflow-markdown · SubjectNest by NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd · Keep the complete source and licence companions; item rights remain separate.