SubjectNest resource library

Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Year 3 / Hass / Term 1 / Weeks 03 04 / Checks

Development draft · local review needed

Two views of Oak LibraryYear 3 HASS · T1 W3–4 · Checks / C first source · Text version

Download editable text

Made-up library record O says in 2019 the returns box sat beside the entrance and in 2022 it moved beside the desk; the purpose recorded by staff was to bring returns closer to where they sorted books. Invented visitor Etta says “The new spot is easier for me to find because I ask at the desk.” Invented visitor Luis says “I liked the entrance spot because I could leave a book quickly without joining the desk queue.” The record does not say how long either waited or what all library users thought.

Original labelled illustration; complete text alternative linked below.
Original labelled source illustration or empty own mat.

View / edit the whole SVG · Complete terms · Complete text alternative.

Your questions

  1. What change and staff reason does record O describe?
  2. What mattered to Etta? What mattered to Luis? Show their words or tell their ideas.
  3. What can you conclude about these two views? Do they tell us what every user preferred?
  4. Ask one useful question that could help check the effects of the move.

Your empty response page.

Grown-up help Use only after the actual components have been taught. After Days 17–18 source-bound perspective/limits. Familiar staff-reason and change components are retention within this fresh whole case; do not call every component novel. [Teacher selection/conditions](../teacher/ASSESSMENT.html) · [Separate staff criteria](../staff/C-first.html).

Sources and reuse. Original educational work © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0. Selected guidance Modified from linked © State of Queensland (QCAA) 2023, CC BY 4.0 with document exceptions; see the complete notice.

About this resourceReviewed source edition

Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.

Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.

Exact source: 77f0a855d11bc55bbe43734f63dbffc6babe4931 · 2026-10-09. Source edition, roles and hashes

Complete source and rights notices

Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.