SubjectNest resource library

Public educator selection · preserve first work before criteria or later sources. These pages are public; record prior access.

Year 3 / Hass / Term 1 / Weeks 03 04 / Responses

Development draft · local review needed

Your work — Two views of Oak LibraryYear 3 HASS · T1 W3–4 · Responses / C first · Text version

Download editable text

Keep the complete source nearby. You can respond with speech, sign, AAC, directed marks or your own text. Choose only the task your teacher offered.

1. What change and staff reason does record O describe?

2. What mattered to Etta? What mattered to Luis? Show their words or tell their ideas.

3. What can you conclude about these two views? Do they tell us what every user preferred?

4. Ask one useful question that could help check the effects of the move.

Grown-up help These are four empty areas, not hints or scores. A neutral reader or scribe can preserve the child’s exact reasoning. Record subject cues separately. A declined or inaccessible opportunity is not automatically wrong. [Conditions](../teacher/ASSESSMENT.html).

Sources and reuse. Original educational work © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0. Selected guidance Modified from linked © State of Queensland (QCAA) 2023, CC BY 4.0 with document exceptions; see the complete notice.

About this resourceReviewed source edition

Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.

Labels and search exclusions are distribution guidance; they do not authenticate or restrict access.

Exact source: 77f0a855d11bc55bbe43734f63dbffc6babe4931 · 2026-10-09. Source edition, roles and hashes

Complete source and rights notices

Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.