Complete source
Ordinary fictional community-show preparation. Sami chooses a foil making trail for a younger reader, a soil-role door for a family visitor, or a copper-wire fact card for a repair-display reader. The brief asks for one source-labelled resource explanation, one visible or supplied property clue with its provenance, and one open question. A pretend reader note says “I can't tell which bit you saw.” This note is fictional feedback, not a child-tested outcome. A real invited adult or peer may give different feedback or none.
Day
49
Evidence
Purpose/audience, faithful provenance and reasoned owner-chosen revision. Format choice is not a diagnosis or guaranteed success; real feedback requires a real participant.
Moves
- Invite, 3 minutes: let learners choose who the trail is for and whether to share publicly, privately or only with a helper.
- Read, 5 minutes: read the complete brief and fictional reader note. Return to the relevant full ordinary source/F card, not a slogan or cropped picture.
- Model, 5 minutes: revise an ordinary foil caption for the missing provenance. Label the version before and after, and identify the reason; do not claim a real reader liked it.
- Try together, 5 minutes: ask what a younger reader might need to understand a soil habitat role. Distinguish your prediction about their need from feedback actually obtained.
- Make, 15–20 minutes: follow one route. Keep two own versions if wanted, compare a chosen difference and record keep/change/open with a reason. In paper work cross out or annotate only by owner choice.
- Return, 5 minutes: invite a real reader's question if available and wanted. Preserve exact attribution and support; a private or incomplete product remains a legitimate learning opportunity.
Next teaching
For a source-hidden revision use C17. For feedback assumed from silence use C18. Offer one targeted revision rather than remaking the whole product or revealing an unrelated held key.
Ordinary staff model
Possible ordinary revision: “F1 names the aluminium-making route. I observed the fold in our card; I did not observe ore processing.” The added provenance phrase responds to the pretend note. A different chosen reader may need larger labels or an oral explanation instead of more text.
Question
What would someone be able to do with your trail?
Routes
Complete instruction
Make a small paper gallery card for your chosen object/role. Add source identity, clue provenance, use/importance and an open question. Use a mini-book, flap or large display label. Invite one reader only if you want; leave reader feedback empty if none occurred.
Id
D49-1
Title
Trail gallery
Complete instruction
Offer the same explanation as large tactile heading cards, a signed/spoken/AAC briefing or a helper-read script. Ask an actual reader what they need if they participate; otherwise label the proposed access choice as your design choice. Keep the science relationship when changing format.
Id
D49-2
Title
Access designer
Complete instruction
Use the Desk or paper twin to keep two explicitly chosen own versions. Choose them by their distinct labels in the comparison columns. Inspect one change in Source/Claim/Reader views, then enter your own reason. No automatic quality score or assistant suggestion appears.
Id
D49-3
Title
Two-version compare
Title
Make it useful for your reader