SubjectNest resource library

Year 5 / Integrated / Term 1 / Weeks 03 04

Development draft · local review needed

Staff copy · actual numbers, evidence and next movesYear 5 Inquiry · T1 W3–4 · Teacher key

Download editable text
Teacher copy · prompts and answer keys

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Use after the learner's first response. Keep this page out of the learner stack. The 900 limit is a rule of an invented paper-card model. None of these outputs establishes a real visitor preference, price, safety, accessibility certification or event approval. Record independent reading separately from listened comprehension; record whether multiplication, plan choice or wording was prompted. A child may use AAC, pointing or a scribe without losing their mathematical agency when the child selects the steps and explanation.

Plan Exact product Comparison with 900 Useful check
Book swap 46×18 = 828 cards Fits; 72 below limit 46×(20−2) = 920−92 = 828.
Games meet 24×37 = 888 cards Fits; 12 below limit 25×37−37 = 925−37 = 888; 888÷24 = 37.
Garden model 29×32 = 928 cards 28 over limit 30×32−32 = 960−32 = 928.
Mini museum 42×21 = 882 cards Fits; 18 below limit 42×(20+1) = 840+42 = 882.
Garden revision 28×32 = 896 cards Fits; 4 below limit 28×(30+2) = 840+56 = 896.
Guided Day 15 33×26 = 858 cards Fits; 42 below limit 33×(20+6) = 660+198 = 858.
Guided Day 20 22×41 = 902 cards 2 over limit 22×(40+1) = 880+22 = 902.
One possible Day 20 revision 21×41 = 861 cards Fits; 39 below limit 22×41−41 = 902−41 = 861. Other transparent valid revisions accepted.

What to look for each day

Day First evidence worth keeping If it goes wrong, teach this next
11 Two facts tied to Source A, one flyer overclaim and an answerable question. If cards become visitors, re-label the two table columns and have child point to the missing visitor count.
12 Benchmark before product, rounding direction and a statement that a coarse estimate does not settle a close cap. If 25×40≈1,000 is treated as proof that 24×37 fails, calculate the exact plan and compare the two claims.
13 Product parts keep tens value, label cards, and a 900 comparison. If 46×18 is read as 46+18 or 460+36, rebuild 46 groups of 10 and 8 symbolically.
14 928 > 900; flyer arithmetic corrected without making a claim about real visitors. If a neat poster is accepted as evidence, ask the child to show the factor row and product first.
15 Guided 858 and a source-bound sentence after the separate subject checks. If answer copied from a group, invite a new method individually; do not relabel this as an independent check.
16 Two imagined priorities are paraphrased without a fake survey. If “everyone prefers” persists, underline “I might” and the no-survey note in Source A.
17 888÷24=37 or a genuinely different recomputation; a bound exposes 8,880. If the inverse is merely copied, ask what the quotient counts and rebuild one box/group.
18 Original 29×32=928 is separate from revised 28×32=896; ? is tray count. If 29×32=896 is written, keep both rows visible, circle the changed factor, then substitute.
19 Choice, product, cap, source scope, another possible view, unknown and deliberate revision. If the pitch is polished but uncheckable, ask visitor to reproduce the calculation and locate the source row.
20 902 is over; a labelled revision works; conclusion stays within the model. If a child asserts real cost or safety from cards, ask which source would be needed and save that question.

A child may reasonably reject the suggested garden revision because fewer trays might not represent every invented plant category; the card model alone does not settle that design concern. Other corrected plans are acceptable with accurate calculations and a newly stated meaning. The imagined reader's access priority deserves attention but this pack cannot certify any real access feature. A spoken-presentation outcome requires actual observed delivery, not just a written script. Gather multiple samples before making any achievement judgment.

Original SubjectNest key and feedback moves © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0; credit, link and note changes. Exact curriculum source ledger.