Wanted outcome: an own guide someone can use to avoid an overclaim. Prepare: O1–O5, FACT cards optional, blank three-panel page.
0–3: choose a fictional reader: tray keeper, future recorder or courtyard team. 3–9 model: short guide with question, two exact source details, representation, limit and next step. Example “Compare changes from the same starting time; do not call final height the increase.” 9–21: choose a route. 21–27: willing reader tries to locate the next step; a quiet self-read can substitute. Revise actual wording/order and retain both versions. 27–30 exit: name what you changed for your reader and why. If only decoration changes, ask what decision the guide helps make.
- Route 9A · Three-panel guide. Create
what the record shows / what it cannot show / what to check nextfor O2 or O4. Include source, sample, period, height-change working, survival count and one original representation. Choose a title and specific reader language. - Route 9B · Decision model. Make a labelled flow using O4: choose criterion → compare relevant measure → flag unknown conditions → request a check. Trace two different criteria and show different conditional outputs. The flow advises a fictional team, not automatic plant care.
- Route 9C · Edit the overclaim. Rewrite O5’s universal move-tomorrow note into a useful 60–100 word or equivalent directed response. Preserve an initial version, make one substantive revision and explain it using source limits or reader purpose. No actual publication is required.