Australian Curriculum v9 content-description wording
Official ACARA curriculum workbook, retrieved 29 September 2026. Local pinned import data/frameworks/acara-v9.json carries official-workbook SHA-256 db446882d2c00cf7c085a03e250e2442fda6c44011fc114680c46c1dc7a822c3. The crosswalk reproduces exact selected description wording, year/band and workbook rows, and records partial scope.
Paper Screen sources A–E, Folded Card and theatre checks
Newly authored fictional texts and invented numeric records in this pack. All calculations derive transparently from the stated conditional exponent models; an automated verifier checks key arithmetic. No actual apparatus, user data, school or room is represented.
Original SubjectNest prose/data under CC BY 4.0, attribution “NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd, 2026.” Not evidence of a real optical effect, safety or educational outcome.
Five A4 SVG/PDF aids and text/tactile alternatives
Created locally from make_print.py; rendered as vectors, text extracted and visually desk-checked. No third-party photos, icons, logo or stock.
Original SubjectNest layout and text under CC BY 4.0, attribution as above. PDFs embed DejaVu Sans; its separate font notice applies. SVG/PDF are not themselves raised tactile/Braille.
Locally authored Python standard-library code, using only the invented B table and caller-selected factor in the explorer. No network, tracking or learner record. print/make_print.py, build_crosswalk.py and verify_pack.py reproduce and check this pack.
All .py source in this pack is Apache 2.0, NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026. A numerical fit is not a verified scientific explanation.
Claim and use boundaries
The exact-half relation is a conditional classroom mathematical hypothesis, not a statement that physical paper reliably halves light. Units are explicitly arbitrary and fictional. There is no calibrated uncertainty estimate, engineering recommendation, safety approval, lighting advice or actual experiment from this packet.
Day 14 actual observation is optional and requires school permission, appropriate low-voltage equipment, supervision and local risk assessment. A paper plan earns planning evidence only. “Not observed” must appear when no approved physical test happened. No public installation.
The Arts row is evidenced only by an actually created two-panel media artefact; science argument alone does not establish Arts production. An optional digital model run is not automatically a Technology curriculum outcome.
No place-specific curriculum, First Nations knowledge/language, translation or local permission is asserted. Those require appropriate community and language authority and separate review. Australian Curriculum alignment is partial; this ten-day inquiry does not supply a complete subject or year course.
The desktop teacher/learner/funder review checks usability, links, arithmetic and language. It is not a classroom trial or proof that learners will achieve outcomes.