Teacher desk simulation, not a classroom trial. I set out large band cards, two sizes of an abstract mark, blank moment frames, and kept K/L sealed until their days. The ten 25-minute scripts have distinct purposes: size, order, relative band, repeated motif, fresh K, distinguishing two changes, combining, legibility, original composition, fresh L. I could lead every paper route without music, a paid worksheet or an unsafe floor path. For actual physical movement I still need each child’s consent, safe personal range, local space/supervision and warm-up/cool-down plan. The real-work slot is blank until rights/cultural authority and an encounter are verified.
Learner desk simulation. I used the Day 23 raised-band description to direct “same loop lower, then upper” without standing or reaching. On Day 26 I kept the band fixed while changing curve size, then kept size fixed while changing band. This made the two choices distinct. Check K’s later panels contain no model answer; Check L’s later panels are also blank. A child can choose a paper or AAC route and pass on enactment; an adult cannot mark physical Dance skill from that score.
Potential-funder audit simulation. Official ACARA Foundation rows and Queensland Prep alignment are cited and a local workbook digest is pinned. Nine original A4 SVG/PDF pairs, exact text/tactile/no-print paths, read-only verifier and SHA-256 manifest are inspectable. The materials are free to adapt under the stated original-work licence, while curriculum/font/real work keep their own terms. There are no learner data, uptake statistics, pilot results, accessibility certification, all-state mapping or QCAA endorsement claims.
Critique/next review. A table score is a strong entry point for composition but is not a complete movement experience. An educator should run an optional, accessible physical session with willing children and then revise the supports from actual learner/teacher feedback. The abstract motif examples need local educator and cultural review before any “community dance” discussion. Check print legibility and raised-card practicality with users; desk inspection is not user testing.