SubjectNest resource library

Foundation / Design And Technologies / Term 1 / Weeks 01 02

Development draft · local review needed

Author desk run-through · Design and Technologies W1–2Foundation Design Tech · T1 W1–2 · Run Through

Download editable text

Status: author artifact/logic review on 29 September 2026; no live teacher, child, classroom, physical prototype trial or funder panel. Therefore no actual stand or carrier result, child learning gain, accessibility certification or school safety approval is claimed.

Desk role What I ran through Observed in the authored resources Honest limit and next action
Prep teacher, Day 1 Read the fictional product/service/environment sheet and execute the 3/4/5/7/4/2-minute script with a puppet response. The source distinguishes a product, service prompt and environment, states each person's intended choice and provides a response move. To evidence a familiar actual product/service/environment, educator inserts a school-approved real source and records what a child saw.
Teacher, Day 7 Follow the safe fold/trial guide against the Day 7 script and evidence mat. Materials/equipment, optional action, result labels and adult cue are separate. No printed result is selected. An author desk test cannot show that physical paper stood. Teacher must observe any real making/test and apply local safety/access rules.
Child role, Check A Hide key, read the new fictional LEFT / CLEAR / RIGHT source, generate two broad-paper edge ideas and justify one from the source. The middle route is visible on the printed sheet. The key accepts varied ideas that keep its drawn centre clear and rejects a made-up real access claim. Check A does not assess physical making or real passability. Public source and key are not secure.
Child role, Check B Hide key, read the new circle-card/broad-paper brief, make two paper-shape proposals, name safe steps and choose STAYED/SLIPPED/NOT TRIED only from a supposed real trial. The source and key contain no prefilled material result. A plan-only route is explicitly NOT TRIED; a slipped card is useful revision evidence. No paper carrier was physically made in this author review; in-class result remains unknown.
Time-poor supporter Find a no-cost home route for Days 1–10 and open a linear/tactile print description. Every day offers optional scrap-paper or puppet action; no purchase, family detail, photograph or upload is requested. Home work is optional and not equivalent to teacher observation.
Potential funder Trace two official row descriptions, source hash, QCAA Prep context, rights and evidence boundaries. The pack has exact code/row/wording, two source claims, original reuse terms, printable/linear access and a fail-closed hash receipt. It is an introductory fortnight, not a complete subject, trialed product, certified accessibility route or QCAA endorsement.

Visual QA: all eight SVG/PDF pairs rendered as single-page A4 with selectable text, strong outlines, source labels and unfilled result regions. A full-page contact sheet, both fresh check pages and a browser rendering of the vector sheets were inspected for clipped text and source-order errors. The PDF itself is untagged; its full text alternative is separate. The verifier checks exact source geometry/words, local links and hashes.

Open operational work: teacher-led material safety inspection, adult-prepared paper at an appropriate size, school-selected context, actual observation of any child handling/test, real local familiar-source observation, child/assistive-technology trial, and broader year progression. Preserve unsuccessful/NOT TRIED results as evidence instead of inventing success.