Educator desk run, not a classroom trial. I laid out A with SOME, ALL and NOT TOLD. The drawing of three strips was easy to mistake for three attendees, so Day 112 explicitly returns to notice words. Alba B states an individual reason; Jun C states non-participation but withholds why. Day 116 question cards make an assumption visible without interrogating a child. The independent checks use different event objects, voices and dates, and their worked answers remain in teacher/. An educator must still fit blocks to actual HASS time and source authentic K02 evidence separately.
Learner desk simulation, not a child result. I tried printed, spoken and raised-card routes. For Day 114, I could place Jun's DID NOT MAKE token under ACTION and leave REASON blank. For Check A, I could say “Yara gives a reason; Teo does not; I can ask if Teo wants to share, or leave it open.” For Check B, B is the question that allows a choice and pass. These are adult simulations, not evidence of child comprehension, access, engagement or psychological safety.
Family/carer desk pass. The ten bridges use pack fiction, are optional and need no device, money, adult availability, real observance or return. No child's family is treated as less valuable for declining a story. A home-language or First Nations language version would need competent language and cultural review; none is supplied.
Potential funder desk pass. The visible draft has ten timed scripts, 30 access routes, 20 worked swaps, 10 bridges, eight original A4 pairs, two fresh public checks with separate teacher key, exact ACARA/QCAA pins, rights ledger and SHA-256 receipt. That supports an authored draft/reproducibility claim. It does not prove attainment, teacher time savings, classroom engagement, cultural approval, family inclusion, safeguarding effectiveness or full year coverage. Those claims require real implementation, permissions and evaluated evidence.
Self-critique and next revision: The quiet/declining visitor prevents a common assumption, but a child may still treat the fictional event as an actual family observance. Repeat the fiction/authentic hold and use the school source gate. The question-comparison task needs careful adult tone; real safeguarding matters belong to policy, not roleplay. Eight print pages add preparation, so the exact no-print route should be tried with actual educators and learners before accessibility claims. This is a verified draft, not a 10/10 outcome claim.