SubjectNest resource library

Year 1 / Supplementary / Term 1 / Weeks 01 02 / Hpe

Development draft · local review needed

HPE · teacher checks and next movesYear 1 Subjects · T1 W1–2 · Assessment guide

Download editable text
Teacher copy · prompts and answer keys

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Keep this educator file separate from learner cards. These are fictional prompts, not a child's safety history. A real disclosure or concern follows the school's safeguarding process immediately. Do not grade a child on lending, public speech, speed, force, body shape, or whether they report a private feeling. Sample focus explanations in the short close and review all responses later. Record exact action/reason, support and independent / prompted / not yet observed locally.

Day Secure response or open observation If unclear, teach this next
1 Ari asks before taking; after no, waits, asks for another material or uses a different option. Jo's refusal is valid. If Ari takes the item anyway, replay with paper strips and stop at the reply.
2 The inviter accepts Mila's no (“Okay”) and does not demand an explanation. A later invitation is possible only with respect. If “try again until yes,” practise a one-step hear no → stop asking sequence.
3 Frustrated, surprised, calm or unsure can all be possible for fictional puppets; a helpful action is pause, clarify the rule or offer a fair next turn. If a child labels a real peer's emotion as fact, return to “might feel” and the fictional source.
4 Say stop, move to agreed safe space and seek a known school adult; “I said stop. I need help” is sufficient. School policy names the actual adult/contact. If only a child-to-child solution is offered for a repeatedly ignored boundary, rehearse adult help without asking for personal history.
5 Tari can ask once respectfully. After Ren says no, Tari stops. If asking continues, Ren may repeat stop, move away and seek adult help. Never score Ren on eventually sharing. If the student says Ren must lend, separate ownership/permission from turn-taking and practise a different toy card.
6 A route goes around the shapes with space for another person; walking, rolling, token and child-directed partner routes can all show the idea. If the route cuts through a shape, move a larger token and trace the clear edge.
7 There is no fixed target outcome. Child names one changed direction/effort and describes what happened in that attempt; no object targets a person. If “farther always works with more force,” compare actual tries and ask what else changed.
8 A clear route, quieter setting, partner choice or suitable shade can help someone participate depending on context. Preferences differ; real outdoor plans use school policy and weather. Indoor cards are planning evidence only; do not mark outdoor activity or physical collaboration observed unless it happened. If one setting is declared good for everyone, offer two fictional participants with different choices.
9 A rule gives both a turn and can be revised for access; stop must be respected. No winner is needed. If a rule excludes a participant, ask that learner how the group could change the route or turn.
10 A valid route goes above or below the central block, with an approved movement or paper token. A fair rule allows both turns and respects stop. Reasons refer to clear space and participation. If only a route is shown, ask for a rule. If only a rule, trace the blockage and try an alternative path.

Formative rubric

Record independent / prompted / not yet observed separately for: respectful interaction (asks/listens to permission, accepts no); safe help (can show a stop and adult-help route for a fictional repeated boundary); movement reasoning (selects a workable route or changes one movement variable, reports an actual trial without “always”); physical movement (an accessible body or object-manipulation action actually observed, not inferred from a token plan); fair collaboration (suggests/revises a rule so others can participate); communication/access (shows thinking through any agreed mode). The task's target is the decision and reason, not a particular body's performance. Do not use these ten short activities to label a child or certify Years 1–2 HPE achievement.

Later unfamiliar rechecks: (1) Fictional art-table prompt: one child asks for a brush, another says “after I finish”; ask what both can say/do, and what changes if a clear stop is ignored. (2) A new paper-only route has a blocked lower path and an open upper path; two players alternate a token. Ask for route, fair rule and two reasons. Use these after teaching, not immediately after telling the key.

Reuse: Original SubjectNest formative guidance © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0. Credit source/licence and mark changes.