Teacher, learner… | Year 10 Subjects · T1 W3–4 · Run Through

This is an adult desk simulation and local asset check, not an actual class, clinical evaluation, accessibility certification, efficacy result or funder endorsement. Each issue below caused a concrete correction before release. Use local teacher and learner feedback for further revisions.

Lens	Actual paper/tool walk-through	Fault found and correction	Remaining boundary
New teacher, Science 14	Took the 6,7,6,12 route-count cards through the 12-minute script.	A quick average could hide the altered-arrow note. Staff script now requires all four values, anomaly description and a reproducible re-trace before any deletion.	No real transit or science observation.
New teacher, HASS 12	Followed the linked UN and AHRC accounts, then matched Evatt/Street role cards.	It was easy to conflate a 1945 delegation role with 1948 adoption. The teacher note now makes a two-date timeline and limits the claim to each official account.	Fuller historical source work and local judgement remain.
Learner, Technologies 18	Predicted YES/NO for AND and deliberately faulty OR, then ran the offline rule lab.	A true/true case does not expose the bug. The text route and check key use exactly-one-true cases as discriminators. Unknown gets CHECK DATA before the Boolean branch.	Toy data and an offline tool are not a real service/security audit.
Learner, Arts 17	Used the silent score, then compared it with the 2.4-second quiet tone cue.	Audio alone hid rests and timing for a learner who cannot hear it. Each beat now has a complete text/tactile equivalent; performance is optional.	Actual music teaching/response varies by learner and context.
Accessibility	Tried three print sheets without colour, each full text/tactile route, and the HTML without sound.	Source units and ACTUALLY DONE categories must survive nonvisual reading. They now have word/number labels, and the offline tool has an explicit live text result and a paper route.	Confirm real assistive-technology behaviour with users locally.
HPE teacher	Ran Day18 with a paper-only rule and no actual group.	It would be inaccurate to record “demonstrated fair play”. Staff and learner pages now distinguish plan, directed test and observed willing-group pass/roll movement with reflection on the physical activity outcome.	Local safeguarding, access and movement safety policy decides actual activities.
Potential funder	Traced any claim of “50 lessons”, curriculum coverage and outcomes to artifacts.	The crosswalk says partial/conditional opportunities; 50 are optional 12-minute blocks, not a subject allocation or classroom trial. Public checks/key are not secure.	No measured learning, uptake, implementation approval or complete-year claim.

Replay receipts: python3 verify_pack.py, sha256sum -c MANIFEST.sha256, visual A4 page inspection, PDF size/text/font checks, deterministic audio reproduction, and five real browser runs of the offline rule lab (all four known-value cases plus an unknown-input case). The source ledger records fact/rights boundaries.