Goal: separate a visitor's need from a proposed “live” feature in Card A. Say: “What is the person trying to do, even if no app exists?”
- 0–2: Show the proposal “live availability”; ask what evidence is missing.
- 2–7: Model a need statement: “A visitor wants to know the published practice times before travelling.” Point to the inside-only timetable as evidence.
- 7–13: Pairs identify a missing update process and draw a minimum static page.
- 13–20: Independent response: need, evidence, missing fact and a conditional first idea.
- 20–25: Collect one assumption that would have to be tested before claiming “live”.
Routes: write a need/evidence/unknown table; give a spoken explanation captured in notes; arrange “person / task / evidence / unknown” strips and dictate the same reasoning. Other domains: Day 1 swaps. Optional/home: invent a feature request for a fictional club and rewrite it as a user need on scrap paper. Move: if learners restate “the need is an app”, ask what the visitor could do with a reliable paper timetable sent in advance.