0–3 notice: Read “solve resilience for all” and circle the outcome promise. 3–7 source: Reveal the small-print single-entrance board and missing user consultation; no policy breach is claimed. 7–12 teach: On the issue-question mat, identify specific group/context, possible barrier, resource/enabler and information needed. Model an inquiry question about how programme participants using different information routes can find schedule changes. 12–20 choice: A/B/C drafts one narrow preparatory Unit 1 question, two information needs and a bounded public line. 20–23 audit: Peers check that a board redesign is not presented as implemented or effective. 23–25 exit: One question, one evidence gap and no personal disclosure. Offer separate fresh Check B later if new.
Evidence log: day | exact fictional source detail | frame/resource/barrier/dimension or source-quality reasoning | bounded revision/question | access mode | content prompt | next move. Save actual learner work only in a school-approved system. The QCAA crosswalk names sampled Stage 1 opportunities and major unfinished work.
Original resource rights: © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, SubjectNest, CC BY 4.0. Credit author, source, licence and changes.