This is a practice space. Use the source cards and the route you choose for the day. Name the source, state a bounded claim, and say what remains unknown. You may draw, move full-word cards, write, dictate, speak or use AAC; all routes ask for the same legal reasoning. You do not need to tell anyone about a personal legal experience. Model bills, places and people are invented. On Days 5 and 10, use the fresh public check file your teacher provides. Keep your first response before seeing feedback.
| Day | Your question and first response |
|---|---|
| 1 | Card A: Is the volunteer's “crime” claim established? Identify one rule maker, one missing legal source and a careful conclusion. |
| 2 | Cards A/C: Choose one fair-notice or fair-evidence problem. Name a viewpoint, likely consequence and proportionate improvement. |
| 3 | Cards B/F: Put bill, current Act, relevant judgment and rumour in a justified source order; say what source still cannot prove. |
| 4 | Cards B/D: Draw or tell a Queensland bill pathway and assign a law-making, administering and interpreting role to the appropriate arm. |
| 5 | File J, provided on the check page: decide which assertion is supported; cite one item, one limit and one fair next step. Keep your first answer. |
| 6 | Card D: Make one arm-of-government statement and one Commonwealth/state division statement; explain why they are different questions. |
| 7 | Cards C/E: Describe a conditional court path; distinguish jurisdiction, precedent and disputed facts; contrast the two broad case-presentation models. |
| 8 | Cards C/H: Contrast burden and standard of proof; state an interpretation question and why the supplied clause does not itself create a crime. |
| 9 | Card G: State what the 1986 ALRC summary can support, whose present-day voice is missing and how to seek a better source respectfully. |
| 10 | File K, provided on the check page: explain the status of a bill, distinguish an allegation from proof and give a sourced, culturally careful next step. Keep your first answer. |
Self-check before handing in: Can another person tell which statement is from a source and which is your inference? Have you called a proposal a law, a rule a crime, or an allegation a conviction? If a source is historic, have you dated it? If a source is missing, say so plainly.
Original learner prompts © NeuroForgeIO Pty Ltd 2026, CC BY 4.0.