SubjectNest resource library

Year 4 / Hass / Term 1 / Weeks 03 04 / Aids

Development draft · local review needed

A revised proposal, still untried · SD-laterYear 4 HASS · T1 W3–4 · Aids / Sd later · Text version

Source review complete · local suitability still needs review.

Download editable text

Original A revised proposal, still untried diagram; full text alternative follows

Complete text alternative

A revised proposal, still untried. Original invented D2 revision: paper treasure-game proposal now uses a marked side area rather than the whole open area, and places no clue beside the seat. Noor’s new note: “I still need to know when the open area is available for a ball game.” Bay’s new note: “There would be no clue beside the seat in this plan.” No actual try, safe separation, space dimensions, approval or real feedback supplied. New notes describe the proposed arrangement, not demonstrated benefits. One large source-text panel below its heading, with no decorative people or success/failure symbols. Original neutral record-card geometry only. Full stimulus in reading order; no question/answer/response area. For table cases, each row has its named category and exact quantity; for date cases, dates/statuses remain exact, not scaled gaps; for perspective cases, speaker names and exact notes distinct. No additional fact, provider logo, inferred owner, completed repair, trial, demographic information or solution appears. This is the same complete authored stimulus as the assessment module, not an actual council card or learner event.

Visible words, in reading order

A revised proposal, still untried

Original invented D2 revision: paper treasure-game proposal now uses a marked side area rather than the whole open area, and places no clue beside the seat. Noor’s new note: “I still need to know when the open area is available for a ball game.” Bay’s new note: “There would be no clue beside the seat in this plan.” No actual try, safe separation, space dimensions, approval or real feedback supplied. New notes describe the proposed arrangement, not demonstrated benefits.

About this resourceReviewed source edition

Source review is complete for this two-week edition. Local suitability and classroom use still need review. Earlier candidate or pending-review words are retained in the original files; full-year coverage, translations and audio are not claimed.

Exact source: 1275744dad8a13ed5d34bb53863aaedf743a2cfd · 2026-10-12. Source edition, roles and hashes

Complete source and rights notices

Keep these full notices with copies of this resource. Learning text, software, art and outside sources keep their own terms.