SubjectNest resource library

Year 6 / English / Term 1 / Weeks 03 04

Development draft · local review needed

Sources, rights and editorial verification · English Days 11–20Year 6 English · T1 W3–4 · Sources And Review

Download editable text

Claim and source ledger

Material or claim Evidence used Review result / limit
Year 6 v9 content descriptions and workbook rows Official ACARA curriculum workbook, pinned SHA-256 db446882d2c00cf7c085a03e250e2442fda6c44011fc114680c46c1dc7a822c3, retrieved 29 September 2026; exact crosswalk Thirteen row/code/level/area/wording records are verified locally against the pinned import. This is a dated Australian Curriculum v9 mapping, not a state-specific implementation ruling or whole-year coverage.
Australian state/territory use QCAA English v9 implementation entry and official ACARA workbook Queensland is an initial implementation reference, not a claim that the same week order suits all schools. Check each jurisdiction's current scope, sequence and local requirements before adoption.
Dockside Sources A–D and Mini-cases E–G Authored for this pack; no source imported or real testimony represented Every name, date, item, count, location and comment is invented. A/B/D reuse one fictional club's trial, so agreement is not independent verification. C has exactly two selected fictional comments, with selection process and visitor count unknown.
Fictional counts and logical boundaries Closing tally: 11 + 4 + 3 = 18; zine shelf 18 + 12 = 30; sports returns 16 + 4 = 20; label test 32 + 8 = 40; Day 15 9 + 3 = 12; Day 20 19 + 11 = 30 Arithmetic checked. “Working at closing”, “taken”, “return logged” and “readable after one indoor day” must not become durable success, satisfaction, loss or weatherproofing. No real-world efficacy is claimed.
Original poster, source mat and planner SVG drawing source, three PDF/SVG pairs and full alternatives Original text/vector layouts, no stock art, photos, commercial logos or copied worksheet. PDFs are one-page A4 with selectable text and were visually inspected; this is a desk review, not a screen-reader or low-vision user trial.
Inclusion and learner modes Authored access choices in lessons, clean pages, aid alternatives and staff key Modes are offered without fixed “visual/auditory learner” labels or diagnostic assumptions. Read-aloud may support reasoning but is not evidence of independent decoding. Schools and specialists should review actual learner access.
Assessment and outcome Day 15/20 fresh items and separate staff next-move key Checks can guide next teaching steps in this invented task. No psychometric validation, classroom reliability, achievement-standard equivalence or measured learning gain is claimed.

Rights and provenance

Independent review still needed

Curriculum teacher review in each target state/territory, learner readability and EAL/D review, screen-reader/print accessibility with real users, and a classroom pilot. The desk run-through records internal simulation only. Before release to a new jurisdiction, refresh the official source and verify every inherited/local requirement again.