Goal/materials: evaluate support, limits and possible effect on attitudes; Cards A–C, comparison strip.
- Notice, 3: Retrieve source types: mock post, proposal note, attributed fictional voices. Key: each has a different purpose and limit.
- Model, 5: “Card A says exclude all teenagers. Card B instead proposes use by different ages, but has no study. Card C asks about practical conditions. I can conclude the universal exclusion claim is unsupported; I cannot conclude the proposal is approved or perfect.”
- Guide, 7: Class fills
claim / actual source detail / unknownfor three statements:all young people make noise,a step-free route is proposed,the site is approved. Keys: unsupported, stated concept only, not supplied. - Try, 7: Learner gives a 3-sentence spoken/written comparison with two source labels and one uncertainty. An AAC sequence or typed table is valid; note content cues.
- Check, 3: “What is the difference between a stated step-free route and a verified accessible site?” Key: one is a proposal; the other needs design and lived-use/access review. Next: rewrite a too-certain sentence with
proposes.