SubjectNest resource library

Development draft · local review needed

Day 27 · Compare two possible care messagesFoundation HASS · T1 W5–6 · Day 27 lesson

Prepare this lesson

Foundation / Hass / Term 1 / Weeks 05 06

Part of the full two-week lesson sequence. Check the pack guide and taught point before teaching.

Open for this lesson: Pack guide · Sources and materials · Worked swaps · Fresh learner checks · Aids and text routes.

Download full sequence

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Learner choices

Target/codes: Draw a cautious conclusion about which fictional care message is supported as a proposal, not a proven effect; AC9HSFS04 and AC9HSFS05, AC9HSFK03 partial.

  1. Settle/purpose · 3 min. Remind children that the archive is make-believe and actual classroom rules come from their teacher.
  2. Read source · 4 min. Display B and care mat. Offer messages M1 “Could return large cards to the low shelf after use” and M2 “The shade square made every visitor comfortable.”
  3. Model inquiry · 5 min. Choose M1 as a message based on Bea's written instruction. Reject M2 as a result claim: neither real comfort nor all visitors were measured.
  4. Child response · 7 min. Children assign each message to “source-backed proposal” or “not shown,” cite B or another card, then rewrite M2 into a genuine question about what a real approved observation might ask.
  5. Check/respond · 4 min. Record category and reason. If “Bea says” becomes “everyone did,” ask the child to repeat the exact verb “Return,” and identify instruction versus action.
  6. Exit · 2 min. Child says “We could ; we have not seen whether .”