Each swap keeps the day's source question and evidence limit. These are invented rehearsal cards, not a child's home or community records. Use them after modelling, and keep fresh Check A/B details out of ordinary practice.
| Day | Worked swap 1 | Worked swap 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 91 | Garden tool sketch: drawing has a round handle and short teeth → “The handle is round”; who made the tool is not told. | Bus-stop game card: drawn rectangle has two arrows → “I can see two arrows”; whether anyone followed them is not told. |
| 92 | Library bookmark: unsigned drawing shows a star; Mei's named note says “I made this bookmark” → assign appearance to drawing and maker report to Mei. | Sports cone: photo-free outline shows stripes; Jo's card says “I painted the stripes” → separate unnamed drawer from Jo's own claim. |
| 93 | Lunch-list sign: Nia says “I wrote big letters so my friend could read” → Nia's purpose, not proof every child read. | Toy-box label: Dev says “I drew a wheel to help people tidy” → Dev's intent; actual tidying remains unknown. |
| 94 | Clinic waiting card: maker note says “I drew a sun”; later copied card adds “everyone smiled” → sun is copied, everyone-smiled needs accounts. | Market crate label: maker says “I wrote pears”; later label says “all shoppers chose pears” → maker text supports the first, not every shopper's choice. |
| 95 | After first check, new practice only: a fictional park ticket drawing plus maker note → identify which describes appearance and which reports maker. | After first check, new practice only: a copied café menu card adds “everyone liked it” → ask for visitor evidence; do not repeat check details. |
| 96 | Art table tray: one visitor says “I found pencils after asking” → one person's route, not all visitors' routes. | Pool towel symbol: one visitor says “I noticed the circle” → one noticing account, not a successful sign for everyone. |
| 97 | Train-play timetable: “what colour was the card?” → choose drawing; “did all riders use it?” → need more evidence. | Pet-care chart: “why did Eli draw a bowl?” → choose Eli's note; “did every carer follow it?” → intent is insufficient. |
| 98 | Seed-packet display: “Drawing shows three leaves; Ana says she chose them so a friend could recognise it; other growers are unknown” → two sources and one boundary. | Community-hall coat tag: “Sketch shows a hook; Bo reports making the tag; visitor use has not been recorded” → cautious label, no invented outcome. |
| 99 | Playground route card: speaker points to drawing and maker note → “Drawing has one arrow; Pat says they drew it for a friend; I cannot say how everyone walked.” | Home-game score pad: speaker uses illustration and Lou's note → “Two boxes are shown; Lou says why they made them; no score result follows.” |
| 100 | After final check, new practice only: a fictional shelf drawing plus a writer's note → explain whose words report purpose. | After final check, new practice only: a retold museum-free paper display adds “all visitors understood” → mark that conclusion open without a visit record. |