SubjectNest resource library

Foundation / Hass / Term 3 / Weeks 21 22 / Teacher

Development draft · local review needed

Teacher-only worked checks and next teachingFoundation HASS · T3 W21–22 · Teacher · Key And Next

Download editable text
Teacher copy · prompts and answer keys

Teacher copy: This page may include teaching prompts or answer keys. Answer keys in this public library can be viewed by anyone. Give learners a clean prompt, use checks as formative evidence, and change a case locally when prior access matters.

Open only after each child's first independent response and exact help have been preserved. These are public formative checks, not secure examinations, QCAA assessment tasks, real consent records or proof of an actual place. Accept source-grounded equivalent wording, pointing, AAC, sign and tactile choices. Treat “supported?” and “may share?” as separate questions.

Check A · Ribbon Room worked interpretation

  1. Source 1 names an oval table and square notice board. Icons show shapes/features, not positions or routes. A child need only identify both with an equivalent description.
  2. Nola, Source 2, says the oval table matters to Nola because Nola can sort paper boats there. Its status is not asked, not “refused” or “approved.” It cannot be quoted in a pretend public guide yet.
  3. The Source 3 feature sentence matches Source 1. Nola's personal words/attributed view must wait for permission. “Everyone loves the oval table” requires other visitor evidence and cannot be concluded from Nola alone. A proposal is not a posted guide.
  4. Example now: “The pretend Ribbon Room has an oval table and square notice board (Source 1).” Valid open questions: “Would Nola agree to public quotation?” or “What do other visitors think?” If a child asks for a future approved source, mark it needed, not obtained. No invented teacher approval substitutes for Nola's permission.

If the child uses Nola's true-to-Nola view as public permission, revisit Day 103 with a new fictional note. If “not asked” becomes “declined,” separate status cards. If the unsupported universal is repeated, put a single named speaker beside an empty other-visitors box. Preserve first response.

Check B · Copper Room worked interpretation

  1. Source 1 names a triangular craft desk and round reading cushion. It provides no positions, route, real access finding or universal use claim.
  2. Miko likes the craft desk for folding paper; the fictional status permits Miko's exact sentence with Miko named in the pretend guide. Dara likes the cushion for quiet looking, but Dara's fictional status declines public use of that sentence. A child can discuss that Source 3 says this privately without publishing it.
  3. Source 4's feature list is supported by Source 1. The draft's combined “Miko and Dara like these features” would share Dara's declined view if published. “All visitors enjoy” has no all-visitor evidence; neither one nor two personal views supports it.
  4. Example: “The pretend Copper Room has a triangular craft desk and a round reading cushion (Source 1). Miko says, ‘I like the triangular craft desk for folding paper’ (Source 2, exact permitted sentence in this fictional exercise).” Hold Dara's quote and universal claim. An open question is what other visitors think or where features actually are. This is a paper rehearsal, not real consent or display.

If a child treats permission as evidence all people agree, separate shareability from scope. If a child includes Dara by default, revisit the declined status in an entirely new case. If a child includes only feature facts, the guide is safe but may not show the two-source/individual-view target; invite that practice after first response.

Day-by-day teacher next-step record

Day Look for in first child-controlled response Next small move
101 Two named features; feeling left unknown. Contrast list with a person's note.
102 Feature facts sorted for audience; no invented route. Ask which source says each feature.
103 Emi's own reason and NOT ASKED status kept separate. Revisit one speaker/status token.
104 B/C viewpoints and statuses differentiated; Fin's permitted sentence bounded. Compare an exact quote with an over-broad paraphrase.
105 Fresh A: feature, Nola view/status, guide hold and unsupported universal. Practise first missing decision later with new fiction.
106 D sorted into fact, waiting quote and unsupported claim. Ask content and permission separately.
107 Guide includes sourced feature and bounded permitted quote, no real route. Keep child's first draft and revise one line.
108 Hypothetical permission labelled IF; view remains individual. Use two independent toggles.
109 Two decisions explained to willing listener with sources. Scribe child's exact words, not adult inference.
110 Fresh B: feature, Miko/Dara status, universal hold, cautious guide. Use a different setting for the missing source move.

Curriculum hold: The invented rooms are not a child's actual familiar place. K03 is concept rehearsal only; K01, K02 and K04 also remain open. Authentic place and Country/Place learning needs locally reviewed sources under LOCAL-SOURCE-INSERT.md. Partial S01–S05 practice does not prove a year-end standard.