SubjectNest resource library

Foundation / Hass / Term 4 / Weeks 33 34

Development draft · local review needed

Four-role author desk critique · 30 September 2026Foundation HASS · T4 W33–34 · Run Through

Download editable text

Status: author simulations of teacher, learner, parent/carer and potential funder only. No independent participant/classroom, actual child/place/account/care record or physical tactile build. These roles inspect files/source relationships; they aren't teaching/access/learning/interest/consent/market evidence.

Teacher role: I followed the same-scene two-view construction instructions on screen: A leaves right region hidden, B depicts both source pots, with no time-based growth/move claim. I traced each source mark, the two distinct own reasons, Lex's request, reported model before/after and helper's future guide check/tour. The ordinary scripts build a first window, second window, own-reason flaps, care tab, held check, portable guide, bounded trial/correction flap, permitted useful task, small private tour and second held check. The actual route contains safe-point/source preflight, local feature/connection evidence, willing accounts, exact care procedure, useful permitted guide placement/page-return or no-action explanation, actual reader feedback and element-specific K03 decisions. Second source/point gaps stay honest; the complete paper route doesn't depend on them. Local lesson language/pacing/task/source suitability remains educator review.

Learner role: In desk simulation I followed print/point, exact oral and adult-directed construction choices. One hidden region didn't make its objects absent. Two named reasons could remain side by side, without deciding a winner. One model report supported its own before/after only; a new child illustration was a separate classroom artifact. I could choose flat panels/no-touch/description without walking, folding or plant contact. Fresh cases required same goals with new features, marks, people and trial. These are author interpretations, not any learner's comprehension/interest/independence. I didn't physically make/test a paper/tactile guide.

Parent/carer role: I checked ten free optional invented-paper bridges with school equivalents, no returned evidence/score, home map/inspection/address, device/purchase, family interview, cultural disclosure or real plant/property movement. A pass has no assessment cost. Actual-source work is school-preflighted; no private home evidence is requested. Home language can carry reasoning; any supplied translation needs fluent human/local review. No parent/carer reviewed the pack.

Potential funder role: I checked completeness: ten timed practical scripts, thirty choices, twenty worked domains, ten bridges, two held fresh skill checks/separate key, nine original A4 pairs/exact alternatives, integrated actual K03 route/standard record, official pins/rights/full hashes. These support authored draft/reproduction structure, not time saved, demand, full-year coverage, completed knowledge, care benefit, learning gain, engagement, universal access or commercial suitability. K01/K02/K04 remain authentic-source/local-authority gates.

Residual critique: hidden-view versus absence is demanding; teach one feature/view at a time and keep spot/source labels visible. Two own reasons need no conflict story or vote. Different observation times/views don't establish change or cause. Seven-minute making needs pre-made frames/folds and full adult-directed options. Partial actual evidence may support individual K03 elements; completed guide/tour doesn't fill the whole row. No physical care act is required for sourced care understanding. PDFs are untagged; individual print/screen-reader/tactile/AAC/language/pacing review remains pending. No “10/10” quality score or child outcome claimed.

Reproduction: python print/generate_print.py --regenerate deliberately writes only nine named SVG/PDF pairs and alternatives. python verify_pack.py --manifest-json prints proposed complete hashes for deliberate author saving; normal verifier is offline/read-only. Python 3/Pillow/DejaVu, librsvg, pdfinfo, pdftotext and pdffonts required. Fixed PDF build clock is reproduction metadata, not source/event time.

Final technical receipt · 30 September 2026

Remaining human/local gates: educator pacing/language/adoption/timetable and curriculum decisions; actual place/point/source/privacy/task/audience approval; genuine element-specific K03 records; individual print/screen-reader/tactile/AAC/language access review; cultural-authority/ICIP permissions for applicable extensions; independent classroom/parent/funder evaluation. K01/K02/K04 remain separate authentic-source holds. No actual place teaching, care action/benefit, tour, learner knowledge, learning gain or completed K03 evidence occurred in authoring. No classroom/access/cultural/commercial certification implied.